• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者脓毒性休克的长期预后。

Long-term prognosis of septic shock in cancer patients.

机构信息

Intensive Care and Infectious Disease Unit, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

Hematology, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1325-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04937-4. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-04937-4
PMID:31243586
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In the last decades, the number of cancer patients admitted in intensive care units (ICUs) for septic shock has dramatically increased. However, prognosis data remain scarce.

METHODS

To assess the 180-day mortality rate in cancer patients admitted to the ICU for septic shock, a 5-year prospective study was performed. All adult patients admitted for septic shock were included and categorized into the following two groups and four subgroups: cancer patients (solid tumor or hematological malignancy) and non-cancer patients (immunocompromised or not). Data were collected and compared between the groups. Upon early ICU admission, the decision to forgo life-sustaining therapy (DFLST) or not was made by consultation among hematologists, oncologists, and the patients or their relatives.

RESULTS

During the study period, 496 patients were admitted for septic shock: 252 cancer patients (119 hematological malignancies and 133 solid tumors) and 244 non-cancer patients. A DFLST was made for 39% of the non-cancer patients and 52% of the cancer patients. The 180-day mortality rate among the cancer patients was 51% and 68% for those with hematological malignancies and solid cancers, respectively. The mortality rate among the non-cancer patients was 44%. In a multivariate analysis, the performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, simplified acute physiology score 2, sequential organ failure assessment score, and DFLST were independent predictors of 180-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite early admission to the ICU, the 180-day mortality rate due to septic shock was higher in cancer patients compared with non-cancer patients, due to excess mortality in the patients with solid tumors. The long-term prognosis of cancer patients with septic shock is modulated by their general state, severity of organ failure, and DFLST.

摘要

目的

在过去几十年中,因感染性休克而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的癌症患者数量显著增加。然而,预后数据仍然有限。

方法

为评估因感染性休克入住 ICU 的癌症患者的 180 天死亡率,进行了一项为期 5 年的前瞻性研究。所有因感染性休克而入院的成年患者均被纳入并分为以下两组和四个亚组:癌症患者(实体瘤或血液恶性肿瘤)和非癌症患者(免疫功能低下或不免疫功能低下)。收集并比较了各组之间的数据。在 ICU 早期入院时,由血液科医生、肿瘤科医生和患者或其亲属共同决定是否放弃生命支持治疗(DFLST)。

结果

在研究期间,共有 496 名患者因感染性休克入院:252 名癌症患者(119 名血液恶性肿瘤和 133 名实体瘤)和 244 名非癌症患者。39%的非癌症患者和 52%的癌症患者进行了 DFLST。癌症患者的 180 天死亡率分别为血液恶性肿瘤和实体瘤患者的 51%和 68%。非癌症患者的死亡率为 44%。在多变量分析中,表现状态、Charlson 合并症指数、简化急性生理学评分 2、序贯器官衰竭评估评分和 DFLST 是 180 天死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管早期入住 ICU,但因感染性休克导致的 180 天死亡率在癌症患者中高于非癌症患者,这是由于实体瘤患者的死亡率过高所致。感染性休克癌症患者的长期预后受其一般状态、器官衰竭严重程度和 DFLST 调节。

相似文献

1
Long-term prognosis of septic shock in cancer patients.癌症患者脓毒性休克的长期预后。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1325-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04937-4. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
Prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的危重症癌症患者的预后因素。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
3
Time Course of Septic Shock in Immunocompromised and Nonimmunocompromised Patients.免疫功能低下和免疫功能正常患者脓毒性休克的病程
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002722.
4
Outcomes and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Solid Tumors and Septic Shock Defined by Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Criteria.第三版国际脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义共识标准定义的实体瘤伴脓毒性休克患者的 28 天死亡率及预测因素。
Chest. 2022 Nov;162(5):1063-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Prognostic factors, long-term survival, and outcome of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中接受化疗的癌症患者的预后因素、长期生存情况及结局
Ann Hematol. 2014 Oct;93(10):1629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2141-x. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
6
Sepsis-Associated Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Malignancies.恶性肿瘤危重症患者脓毒症相关结局。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Aug;12(8):1185-92. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-046OC.
7
Impact of case volume on survival of septic shock in patients with malignancies.恶性肿瘤脓毒症休克患者的病例量对生存率的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):55-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822d74ba.
8
sTREM-1 predicts intensive care unit and 28-day mortality in cancer patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1可预测患有严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的癌症患者的重症监护病房入住率及28天死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):440.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock.重症癌症合并感染性休克患者生存率的提高。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Oct;29(10):1688-95. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1957-y. Epub 2003 Sep 12.
10
Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study.土耳其重症监护病房脓毒症的流行病学:一项多中心、时点患病率研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Apr 16;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2013-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Advocating for the recognition of underlying immunosuppression in critical illness.倡导认识危重症中潜在的免疫抑制。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 30;85:103300. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103300. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Expression of inflammatory factors and distribution of pathogens in patients with septic shock and their correlation with prognosis: a cross-sectional study.脓毒症休克患者炎症因子表达及病原菌分布情况及其与预后的相关性:一项横断面研究
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2025 Jul 7;67:e45. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202567045. eCollection 2025.
3
The impact of renal dysfunction after critical illness on the management of cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study of cancer survivors and risk of sepsis within the REGARDS cohort.REGARDS队列中癌症幸存者与败血症风险的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;55:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 25.
2
Consensus statement for cancer patients requiring intensive care support.癌症患者需要重症监护支持的共识声明。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Jul;97(7):1271-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3312-y. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
3
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update.拯救脓毒症运动集束化治疗方案:2018年更新版
危重症后肾功能不全对癌症治疗的影响。
Front Nephrol. 2025 May 22;5:1597253. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2025.1597253. eCollection 2025.
4
Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of sepsis in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者脓毒症的临床特征及预后因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):7078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87457-y.
5
Survival of Patients with Solid Tumours and Sepsis Admitted to Intensive Care in a Tertiary Oncology Centre: A Retrospective Analysis.三级肿瘤中心重症监护病房收治的实体瘤合并脓毒症患者的生存情况:一项回顾性分析
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun;40(6):642-650. doi: 10.1177/08850666241312621. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
6
Identification of common core genes and pathways in childhood sepsis and cancer by bioinformatics analysis.通过生物信息学分析鉴定儿童脓毒症和癌症中的共同核心基因及通路。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Dec 5;15(1):749. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01651-4.
7
Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.免疫功能低下的癌症患者的脓毒症性休克:叙述性综述。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 30;28(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05073-0.
8
Patients with cancer and sepsis trials: an unfair representation?癌症和脓毒症试验患者:代表性不公平?
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Dec 8;23(6):635-636. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0408.
9
Multi-Omics Endotypes in ICU Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression.重症监护病房中脓毒症诱导的免疫抑制的多组学内型
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 25;11(5):1119. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051119.
10
All-cause mortality in cancer patients treated for sepsis in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房中因败血症接受治疗的癌症患者的全因死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10099-10109. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07392-w. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock.氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松治疗脓毒性休克成人患者。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):809-818. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705716.
5
Comparison of European ICU patients in 2012 (ICON) versus 2002 (SOAP).2012 年欧洲 ICU 患者(ICON)与 2002 年(SOAP)比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5043-2. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock.辅助糖皮质激素治疗脓毒性休克患者。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):797-808. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705835. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
7
Time Course of Septic Shock in Immunocompromised and Nonimmunocompromised Patients.免疫功能低下和免疫功能正常患者脓毒性休克的病程
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002722.
8
The Intensive Care Medicine research agenda on critically ill oncology and hematology patients.重症肿瘤和血液学患者的重症监护医学研究议程。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1366-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4884-z. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.