• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗透明细胞肉瘤的预后分析:来自单个中心的罕见肿瘤分析。

Prognostic analysis of surgically treated clear cell sarcoma: an analysis of a rare tumor from a single center.

机构信息

Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01487-x. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-019-01487-x
PMID:31243628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6861539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic value of various factors in clear cell sarcoma patients after radical surgery.

METHODS

Forty-two clear cell sarcoma patients from August 2006 to March 2018 were included in the study. Curves of disease-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses of various prognostic factors were performed using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Laboratory test of peripheral blood was recorded before surgery. The optimal cutoff value of systemic inflammatory markers was defined by receiver-operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS and 5-year OS rate were 22% and 46%, respectively. The median DFS and OS times were 12 and 41.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, there was a significant association between shorter DFS and tumor size larger than 5 cm (p = 0.0043), positive surgical margin (p = 0.0233), and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) higher than 2.73 (p = 0.0009). Furthermore, we observed a significant association between shorter OS and tumor size larger than 5 cm (p = 0.0075), positive surgical margin (p = 0.0101), NLR higher than 2.73 (p = 0.0126), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) higher than 103.89 (p = 0.0147) and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) lower than 4.2 (p = 0.0445). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the surgical margin (p = 0.013) and NLR (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with DFS. Tumor size (p = 0.010) and NLR (p = 0.013) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study had the second largest sample around the world and preoperative NLR may be a useful prognostic factor in CCS patients after radical surgery.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究旨在评估根治性手术后影响透明细胞肉瘤患者预后的各种因素。

方法

纳入 2006 年 8 月至 2018 年 3 月的 42 例透明细胞肉瘤患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算无病生存率和总生存率曲线,采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型对各种预后因素进行单因素和多因素分析。记录术前外周血实验室检查。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定系统炎症标志物的最佳截断值。

结果

5 年无病生存率和 5 年总生存率分别为 22%和 46%。中位无病生存时间和总生存时间分别为 12 个月和 41.5 个月。单因素分析显示,无病生存时间较短与肿瘤直径大于 5cm(p=0.0043)、切缘阳性(p=0.0233)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)大于 2.73(p=0.0009)显著相关。此外,我们观察到总生存时间较短与肿瘤直径大于 5cm(p=0.0075)、切缘阳性(p=0.0101)、NLR 大于 2.73(p=0.0126)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)大于 103.89(p=0.0147)和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)小于 4.2(p=0.0445)显著相关。多因素分析表明,切缘(p=0.013)和 NLR(p=0.001)与无病生存显著相关。肿瘤大小(p=0.010)和 NLR(p=0.013)是总生存的独立预后因素。

结论

本研究是全球范围内第二大样本量的研究,术前 NLR 可能是透明细胞肉瘤患者根治性手术后的一个有用的预后因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/609749a44e5c/10147_2019_1487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/235e4503d348/10147_2019_1487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/01560b05251d/10147_2019_1487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/609749a44e5c/10147_2019_1487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/235e4503d348/10147_2019_1487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/01560b05251d/10147_2019_1487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c0/6861539/609749a44e5c/10147_2019_1487_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic analysis of surgically treated clear cell sarcoma: an analysis of a rare tumor from a single center.手术治疗透明细胞肉瘤的预后分析:来自单个中心的罕见肿瘤分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01487-x. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of outcomes in inflammatory breast cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为炎性乳腺癌预后的预测指标
Biomark Med. 2021 Oct;15(14):1289-1298. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0717. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Are neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio associated with prognosis in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab?中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和血小板/淋巴细胞比值与接受辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗的HER2阳性早期乳腺癌患者的预后相关吗?
J BUON. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):714-22.
4
The Role of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Platelets in the Prognosis of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值及血小板在转移性肾细胞癌预后中的作用。
Oncology. 2019;97(1):7-17. doi: 10.1159/000498943. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is superior to neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for soft-tissue sarcoma.术前血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为软组织肉瘤的预后因素优于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 2;15:648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1654-6.
6
Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model.术前炎症反应生物标志物在胃癌患者中的预后价值及预测模型的构建
J Transl Med. 2015 Feb 18;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0409-0.
7
Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a more valuable prognostic factor than platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for nonmetastatic rectal cancer.对于非转移性直肠癌,术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是比血小板与淋巴细胞比值更有价值的预后因素。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 Nov;40:327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对可手术切除胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的预后意义。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Nov 23;23:5574-5588. doi: 10.12659/msm.907182.
9
Nomograms for predicting prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers in colorectal cancer patients after radical resection.预测根治性切除术后结直肠癌患者炎症生物标志物预后价值的列线图。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;139(1):220-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30071. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
10
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after pazopanib treatment predicts response in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.帕唑帕尼治疗后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测晚期软组织肉瘤患者的反应。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;23(2):368-374. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1199-6. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)及血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为腹膜后脂肪肉瘤患者的预后标志物
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Mar 29;9:100076. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100076. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
A comprehensive overview of liquid biopsy applications in pediatric solid tumors.液体活检在儿科实体瘤中的应用综述
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Aug 3;8(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00657-z.
3
Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Second-Line Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients: Focus on Lymphocyte/Monocyte Ratio and Trabectedin.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: A meta-analysis.软组织肉瘤患者治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e12176. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012176.
2
Biological significance and prognostic relevance of peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in soft tissue sarcoma.外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在软组织肉瘤中的生物学意义及预后相关性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 10;8(1):11959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30442-5.
3
Neutrophils in cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic strategies.
二线软组织肉瘤患者的全身炎症指标:聚焦淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值和曲贝替定
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;15(4):1080. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041080.
4
Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with untreated or chemotherapy-refractory soft tissue sarcoma: a multicenter, phase 2 trial.阿帕替尼在未经治疗或化疗难治性软组织肉瘤患者中的疗效与安全性:一项多中心2期试验
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):981. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4229.
5
Clinical Experience with Apatinib and Camrelizumab in Advance Clear Cell Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study.阿帕替尼与卡瑞利珠单抗治疗晚期透明细胞肉瘤的临床经验:一项回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Dec 3;13:8999-9005. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S337253. eCollection 2021.
6
Meta-Analysis of Hematological Biomarkers as Reliable Indicators of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Prognosis.血液生物标志物作为软组织肉瘤预后可靠指标的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 30;10:30. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00030. eCollection 2020.
7
Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Foot in an 18-Year-Old Female.一名18岁女性足部的透明细胞肉瘤
Case Rep Orthop. 2019 Nov 23;2019:8378106. doi: 10.1155/2019/8378106. eCollection 2019.
中性粒细胞与癌症:预后作用和治疗策略。
Mol Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0707-7.
4
Preoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio are Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancers Undergoing Surgery.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值是胃癌手术患者的预后因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1764-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3515-x. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Complete response of mediastinal clear cell sarcoma to pembrolizumab with radiotherapy.纵隔透明细胞肉瘤对帕博利珠单抗联合放疗的完全缓解。
Clin Sarcoma Res. 2017 Jul 14;7:14. doi: 10.1186/s13569-017-0079-1. eCollection 2017.
6
Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在乳腺癌中的预后作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 5;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0794-1.
7
Clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer.乳腺癌肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的临床意义。
J Immunother Cancer. 2016 Oct 18;4:59. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0165-6. eCollection 2016.
8
Prognostic impact of preoperative NLR and CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)对胰腺癌的预后影响
Pancreatology. 2016 May-Jun;16(3):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
The Complex Role of Neutrophils in Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis.中性粒细胞在肿瘤血管生成和转移中的复杂作用。
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Feb;4(2):83-91. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0313.
10
Neutrophils in the Tumor Microenvironment.肿瘤微环境中的中性粒细胞
Trends Immunol. 2016 Jan;37(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 14.