• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互利共生网络:向预测理论迈进。

Mutualistic networks: moving closer to a predictive theory.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology & Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2019 Sep;22(9):1517-1534. doi: 10.1111/ele.13279. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1111/ele.13279
PMID:31243858
Abstract

Plant-animal mutualistic networks sustain terrestrial biodiversity and human food security. Global environmental changes threaten these networks, underscoring the urgency for developing a predictive theory on how networks respond to perturbations. Here, I synthesise theoretical advances towards predicting network structure, dynamics, interaction strengths and responses to perturbations. I find that mathematical models incorporating biological mechanisms of mutualistic interactions provide better predictions of network dynamics. Those mechanisms include trait matching, adaptive foraging, and the dynamic consumption and production of both resources and services provided by mutualisms. Models incorporating species traits better predict the potential structure of networks (fundamental niche), while theory based on the dynamics of species abundances, rewards, foraging preferences and reproductive services can predict the extremely dynamic realised structures of networks, and may successfully predict network responses to perturbations. From a theoretician's standpoint, model development must more realistically represent empirical data on interaction strengths, population dynamics and how these vary with perturbations from global change. From an empiricist's standpoint, theory needs to make specific predictions that can be tested by observation or experiments. Developing models using short-term empirical data allows models to make longer term predictions of community dynamics. As more longer term data become available, rigorous tests of model predictions will improve.

摘要

植物-动物互惠网络维持着陆地生物多样性和人类粮食安全。全球环境变化威胁着这些网络,这凸显了迫切需要发展一种关于网络如何对干扰做出反应的预测理论。在这里,我综合了关于预测网络结构、动态、相互作用强度以及对干扰响应的理论进展。我发现,纳入互惠相互作用的生物学机制的数学模型可以更好地预测网络动态。这些机制包括特征匹配、适应性觅食,以及互惠关系提供的资源和服务的动态消耗和生产。纳入物种特征的模型可以更好地预测网络的潜在结构(基础生态位),而基于物种丰度、奖励、觅食偏好和生殖服务动态的理论可以预测网络极其动态的实现结构,并可能成功预测网络对干扰的响应。从理论学家的角度来看,模型的发展必须更真实地反映关于相互作用强度、种群动态以及这些动态如何随全球变化的干扰而变化的经验数据。从经验主义者的角度来看,理论需要做出可以通过观察或实验来检验的具体预测。使用短期经验数据来开发模型可以使模型对群落动态做出更长时间的预测。随着更多长期数据的出现,对模型预测的严格检验将得到改善。

相似文献

1
Mutualistic networks: moving closer to a predictive theory.互利共生网络:向预测理论迈进。
Ecol Lett. 2019 Sep;22(9):1517-1534. doi: 10.1111/ele.13279. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
Niche Theory for Mutualism: A Graphical Approach to Plant-Pollinator Network Dynamics.共生的生态位理论:植物-传粉者网络动态的图形方法。
Am Nat. 2021 Apr;197(4):393-404. doi: 10.1086/712831. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: Incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks.从食果性到种子传播:将植物-食果动物网络中相互作用的功能结果纳入其中。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12831. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
4
Interaction generalisation and demographic feedbacks drive the resilience of plant-insect networks to extinctions.相互作用泛化和人口统计反馈驱动植物-昆虫网络对灭绝的恢复力。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Sep;90(9):2109-2121. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13547. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
Mutualism increases diversity, stability, and function of multiplex networks that integrate pollinators into food webs.互利共生会增加将传粉媒介纳入食物网的多重网络的多样性、稳定性和功能。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 1;11(1):2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15688-w.
6
Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability.由于适应性觅食导致的生态位分化逆转了嵌套性和连通性对传粉网络稳定性的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Oct;19(10):1277-86. doi: 10.1111/ele.12664.
7
Why are some plant-pollinator networks more nested than others?为什么有些植物-传粉者网络比其他网络更嵌套?
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Oct;86(6):1417-1424. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12749. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Topological plasticity increases robustness of mutualistic networks.拓扑可塑性提高了互利共生网络的鲁棒性。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jul;81(4):896-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01960.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Evolutionary emergence of plant and pollinator polymorphisms in consumer-resource mutualisms.植物与传粉者互惠关系中消费资源多态性的进化出现
J Theor Biol. 2024 Nov 7;594:111911. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111911. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
10
Adaptive foraging behaviour of individual pollinators and the coexistence of co-flowering plants.个体传粉者的适应觅食行为与同期开花植物的共存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 18;281(1776):20132437. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2437. Print 2014 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural stability estimated through critical perturbation determines evolutionary persistence in mutualistic model ecosystems.通过临界扰动估计的结构稳定性决定了互利共生模型生态系统中的进化持久性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 6;12(8):250123. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250123. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Mutualism and Dispersal Heterogeneity Shape Stability, Biodiversity, and Structure of Theoretical Plant-Pollinator Meta-Networks.互利共生与扩散异质性塑造理论植物-传粉者元网络的稳定性、生物多样性和结构。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;14(14):2127. doi: 10.3390/plants14142127.
3
Socioecological benefits of academic greenspace for human health, plant, and pollinator diversity: A mixed-method study protocol.
学术绿地对人类健康、植物和传粉者多样性的社会生态效益:一项混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0317386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317386. eCollection 2025.
4
Odonata Diversity and Ecological Thresholds in Protected Areas of the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马逊保护区内蜻蜓目昆虫的多样性与生态阈值
Neotrop Entomol. 2025 Mar 26;54(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s13744-025-01265-7.
5
Floral and pollinator functional diversity mediate network structure along an elevational gradient.花卉和传粉者的功能多样性沿海拔梯度介导网络结构。
Alp Bot. 2024;134(2):193-206. doi: 10.1007/s00035-024-00308-w. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
6
Reviving collapsed plant-pollinator networks from a single species.从单一物种恢复崩溃的植物-传粉者网络。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Oct 4;22(10):e3002826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002826. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Connected interactions: enriching food web research by spatial and social interactions.关联相互作用:通过空间和社会相互作用丰富食物网研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Sep 9;379(1909):20230163. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0163. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Exotic and native plants play equally important roles in supporting and structuring plant-hummingbird networks within urban green spaces.外来植物和本地植物在支持和构建城市绿地中植物-蜂鸟网络方面发挥着同等重要的作用。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 21;12:e16996. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16996. eCollection 2024.
9
Manipulating network connectance by altering plant attractiveness.通过改变植物吸引力来操纵网络连接度。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 9;11:e16319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16319. eCollection 2023.
10
The role of intra-guild indirect interactions in assembling plant-pollinator networks.种内间接相互作用在组装植物-传粉者网络中的作用。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 18;14(1):5797. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41508-y.