Ducreux Michel, Chamseddine Ali, Laurent-Puig Pierre, Smolenschi Cristina, Hollebecque Antoine, Dartigues Peggy, Samallin Emmanuelle, Boige Valérie, Malka David, Gelli Maximiliano
Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif Cedex, 94805, France.
Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Jun 18;11:1758835919856494. doi: 10.1177/1758835919856494. eCollection 2019.
Over the past two decades, the molecular characterization of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been revolutionized by the routine implementation of and tests. As a result, it is now known that patients with mCRC harboring mutations experience a poor prognosis. Although it accounts for only 10% of mCRC, this group is heterogeneous; only the V600E mutation, also observed in melanoma, is associated with a very poor prognosis. In terms of treatment, these patients do not benefit from therapeutics targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In first-line chemotherapy, there are two main options; the first one is to use a triple chemotherapy combination of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, with the addition of bevacizumab, because analysis of randomized trials have reported interesting results. The other option is to use double chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, since anti-EGFR seems to have modest activity in these patients. Only a small percentage of patients who experience failure of this first-line treatment receive second-line treatment. Monotherapy with BRAF inhibitors has failed in this setting, and different combinations have also been tested. Using the rationale that BRAF inhibitor monotherapy fails due to feedback activation of the EGFR pathway, BRAF inhibitors have been combined with anti-EGFR agents plus or minus MEK inhibitors; however, the results did not live up to the hopes raised by the concept. To date, the best results in second-line treatment have been obtained with a combination of vemurafenib, cetuximab, and irinotecan. Despite these advances, further improvements are needed.
在过去二十年中,转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的分子特征因[具体检测名称1]和[具体检测名称2]检测的常规实施而发生了变革。因此,现在已知携带[具体基因突变名称]突变的mCRC患者预后较差。尽管这一群体仅占mCRC的10%,但具有异质性;只有在黑色素瘤中也观察到的V600E突变与非常差的预后相关。在治疗方面,这些患者无法从靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的治疗中获益。在一线化疗中,有两种主要选择;第一种是使用5-氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂的三联化疗组合,并加用贝伐单抗,因为[具体分析名称]对随机试验的分析报告了有趣的结果。另一种选择是使用双联化疗加贝伐单抗,因为抗EGFR在这些患者中似乎只有适度的活性。只有一小部分一线治疗失败的患者接受二线治疗。BRAF抑制剂单药治疗在这种情况下失败了,不同的联合治疗也进行了测试。基于BRAF抑制剂单药治疗因EGFR通路的反馈激活而失败的理论,BRAF抑制剂已与抗EGFR药物联合使用,加或不加MEK抑制剂;然而,结果并未达到该概念所带来的期望。迄今为止,二线治疗中取得最佳结果的是维莫非尼、西妥昔单抗和伊立替康的联合使用。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍需要进一步改进。