Suppr超能文献

相较于每日一次的训练,每日两次的训练可提高线粒体效率,但不能提高线粒体生物生成。

Twice-a-day training improves mitochondrial efficiency, but not mitochondrial biogenesis, compared with once-daily training.

机构信息

Sport Science Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Academic Center of Vitoria, Federal University of Pernambuco, Vitoria de Santo Antao, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Sep 1;127(3):713-725. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00060.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Abstract

Exercise training performed with lowered muscle glycogen stores can amplify adaptations related to oxidative metabolism, but it is not known if this is affected by the "train-low" strategy used (i.e., once-daily versus twice-a-day training). Fifteen healthy men performed 3 wk of an endurance exercise (100-min) followed by a high-intensity interval exercise 2 (twice-a-day group, = 8) or 14 h (once-daily group, = 7) later; therefore, the second training session always started with low muscle glycogen in both groups. Mitochondrial efficiency (state 4 respiration) was improved only for the twice-a-day group (group × training interaction, < 0.05). However, muscle citrate synthase activity, mitochondria, and lipid area in intermyofibrillar and subsarcolemmal regions, and PGC1α, PPARα, and electron transport chain relative protein abundance were not altered with training in either group ( > 0.05). Markers of aerobic fitness (e.g., peak oxygen uptake) were increased, and plasma lactate, O cost, and rating of perceived exertion during a 100-min exercise task were reduced in both groups, although the reduction in rating of perceived exertion was larger in the twice-a-day group (group × time × training interaction, < 0.05). These findings suggest similar training adaptations with both training low approaches; however, improvements in mitochondrial efficiency and perceived effort seem to be more pronounced with twice-a-day training. We assessed, for the first time, the differences between two "train-low" strategies (once-daily and twice-a-day) in terms of training-induced molecular, functional, and morphological adaptations. We found that both strategies had similar molecular and morphological adaptations; however, only the twice-a-day strategy increased mitochondrial efficiency and had a superior reduction in the rating of perceived exertion during a constant-load exercise compared with once-daily training. Our findings provide novel insights into skeletal muscle adaptations using the "train-low" strategy.

摘要

在肌肉糖原储备较低的情况下进行运动训练可以增强与氧化代谢相关的适应,但目前尚不清楚这是否受到“低训”策略(即每日一次与每日两次训练)的影响。15 名健康男性进行了 3 周的耐力运动(100 分钟),然后在 14 小时(每日一次训练组,n=7)或 2 小时(每日两次训练组,n=8)后进行高强度间歇运动 2 次;因此,两组的第二次训练始终从低肌肉糖原开始。只有每日两次训练组的线粒体效率(状态 4 呼吸)得到改善(组间×训练交互作用,P<0.05)。然而,肌肉柠檬酸合酶活性、线粒体以及肌纤维间和肌小节下区域的脂质面积、PGC1α、PPARα 和电子传递链相对蛋白丰度在两组中均未因训练而改变(P>0.05)。两组的有氧适能标志物(如峰值摄氧量)均增加,且在 100 分钟运动任务中,血浆乳酸、O 成本和主观用力感知评分降低,尽管每日两次训练组的主观用力感知评分降低更明显(组间×时间×训练交互作用,P<0.05)。这些发现表明,两种低训方法都具有相似的训练适应性;然而,与每日一次训练相比,每日两次训练似乎更能提高线粒体效率和主观用力感知。我们首次评估了两种“低训”策略(每日一次和每日两次)在训练诱导的分子、功能和形态适应性方面的差异。我们发现,两种策略都具有相似的分子和形态适应性;然而,只有每日两次训练策略可以增加线粒体效率,并在恒定负荷运动中降低主观用力感知评分,优于每日一次训练。我们的研究结果为使用“低训”策略的骨骼肌适应性提供了新的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验