From the College of Social Work (Hanley, Garland), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Psychosom Med. 2019 Sep;81(7):612-621. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000725.
Mindfulness-based interventions target novel pain relief mechanisms not captured by legacy pain scales, including 1) cultivating awareness of pleasant and neutral sensations proximal to unpleasant sensations and 2) interoceptively mapping sensation location and spatial distribution.
We created a digital sensation manikin (SM) by overlaying a human figure silhouette with a grid of 469 "sensation" pixels. A series of five research questions examined the SM's discriminant validity, construct validity, incremental validity, convergence with an objective measure of pain attentional bias, and sensitivity to a mindfulness-based psychological treatment, Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE). A sample of opioid treated chronic pain patients (n = 108; age, 53.79 (12.94) years; female, 65%) was recruited to answer research questions 1 to 5, and a sample of healthy controls (n = 91; age, 36.47 (13.50) years; female, 55%) was recruited as the comparison group for research question 1.
Chronic pain patients reported significantly more unpleasant sensations than did healthy controls (p < .001, d = 1.23) and significantly fewer pleasant sensations (p = .001, d = 0.50). The SM also evidenced expected relationships with multiple measures of pain (r = 0.26-0.29) and well-being (r = -0.21 to 0.28), uniquely predicted pain interference (β = -0.18), and exhibited a significant association with pain attentional bias (r = 0.25). Finally, mindfulness-based intervention via MORE significantly increased the ratio of pleasant to unpleasant sensations reported by chronic pain patients relative to an active control condition (p = .036, d = 0.51).
This study supports the SM's validity and indicates that assessing both pleasant and unpleasant sensations broadens the scope of pain measurement. Although the SM would benefit from further optimization, its continued use is likely to contribute to improved assessment and treatment options for chronic pain patients.
基于正念的干预针对新颖的疼痛缓解机制,这些机制无法被传统的疼痛量表所捕捉,包括 1)培养对不愉快感觉附近的愉快和中性感觉的意识,以及 2)对内感觉位置和空间分布的映射。
我们通过在人体轮廓上叠加一个由 469 个“感觉”像素组成的网格,创建了一个数字感觉人体模型 (SM)。一系列五个研究问题检验了 SM 的辨别效度、建构效度、增量效度、与客观疼痛注意力偏向测量的一致性,以及对基于正念的心理治疗——正念导向的康复增强 (MORE) 的敏感性。一组接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性疼痛患者 (n = 108; 年龄,53.79(12.94)岁; 女性,65%) 被招募来回答研究问题 1 至 5,一组健康对照组 (n = 91; 年龄,36.47(13.50)岁; 女性,55%) 被招募作为研究问题 1 的对照组。
慢性疼痛患者报告的不愉快感觉明显多于健康对照组 (p <.001,d = 1.23),而愉快感觉明显少于健康对照组 (p =.001,d = 0.50)。SM 还与多项疼痛 (r = 0.26-0.29) 和幸福感 (r = -0.21 至 0.28) 测量指标呈预期关系,独特地预测了疼痛干扰 (β = -0.18),并与疼痛注意力偏向呈显著相关 (r = 0.25)。最后,通过 MORE 进行的基于正念的干预显著增加了慢性疼痛患者报告的愉快感觉与不愉快感觉的比例,与积极对照组相比 (p =.036,d = 0.51)。
本研究支持 SM 的有效性,并表明评估愉快和不愉快感觉可以拓宽疼痛测量的范围。尽管 SM 需要进一步优化,但它的持续使用可能会为慢性疼痛患者的评估和治疗选择带来改善。