Skolasky Richard L, Wegener Stephen T, Aaron Rachel V, Ephraim Patti, Brennan Gerard, Greene Tom, Lane Elizabeth, Minick Kate, Hanley Adam W, Garland Eric L, Fritz Julie M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 11;21(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03324-z.
Low back pain is a prevalent condition that causes a substantial health burden. Despite intensive and expensive clinical efforts, its prevalence is growing. Nonpharmacologic treatments are effective at improving pain-related outcomes; however, treatment effect sizes are often modest. Physical therapy (PT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have the most consistent evidence of effectiveness. Growing evidence also supports mindfulness-based approaches. Discussions with providers and patients highlight the importance of discussing and trying options to find the treatment that works for them and determining what to do when initial treatment is not successful. Herein, we present the protocol for a study that will evaluate evidence-based, protocol-driven treatments using PT, CBT, or mindfulness to examine comparative effectiveness and optimal sequencing for patients with chronic low back pain.
The Optimized Multidisciplinary Treatment Programs for Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (OPTIMIZE) Study will be a multisite, comparative effectiveness trial using a sequential multiple assessment randomized trial design enrolling 945 individuals with chronic low back pain. The co-primary outcomes will be disability (measured using the Oswestry Disability Index) and pain intensity (measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale). After baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to PT or CBT. At week 10, participants who have not experienced at least 50% improvement in disability will be randomized to cross-over phase-1 treatments (e.g., PT to CBT) or to Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE). Treatment will consist of 8 weekly sessions. Long-term outcome assessments will be performed at weeks 26 and 52.
Results of this study may inform referring providers and patients about the most effective nonoperative treatment and/or sequence of nonoperative treatments to treat chronic low back pain.
This study was prospectively registered on March 1, 2019, with Clinicaltrials.gov under the registration number NCT03859713 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03859713).
腰痛是一种普遍存在的疾病,会造成巨大的健康负担。尽管临床投入了大量精力且费用高昂,但其患病率仍在上升。非药物治疗在改善疼痛相关结局方面是有效的;然而,治疗效果通常较为有限。物理治疗(PT)和认知行为疗法(CBT)有最一致的有效性证据。越来越多的证据也支持基于正念的方法。与医疗服务提供者和患者的讨论强调了讨论并尝试各种选择以找到适合他们的治疗方法以及确定初始治疗不成功时该怎么做的重要性。在此,我们展示一项研究的方案,该研究将评估使用PT、CBT或正念的循证、方案驱动治疗,以检查慢性腰痛患者的比较有效性和最佳治疗顺序。
非特异性慢性腰痛优化多学科治疗方案(OPTIMIZE)研究将是一项多中心、比较有效性试验,采用序贯多重评估随机试验设计,招募945名慢性腰痛患者。共同主要结局将是残疾(使用奥斯维斯特残疾指数测量)和疼痛强度(使用数字疼痛评分量表测量)。在基线评估后,参与者将被随机分配到PT或CBT组。在第10周时,残疾改善未达到至少50%的参与者将被随机分配到交叉1期治疗(如从PT转换为CBT)或接受正念导向康复强化治疗(MORE)。治疗将包括每周8次疗程。长期结局评估将在第26周和第52周进行。
本研究结果可能会让转诊医疗服务提供者和患者了解治疗慢性腰痛最有效的非手术治疗方法和/或非手术治疗顺序。
本研究于2019年3月1日在Clinicaltrials.gov上进行前瞻性注册,注册号为NCT03859713(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03859713)。