Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
J Hypertens. 2019 Nov;37(11):2280-2289. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002177.
The current international, 12-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial assessed the efficacy and safety of indapamide sustained release/amlodipine single-pill combination (SPC) in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients.
Following a 4-week run-in period on amlodipine 5 mg, patients (SBP 150-180 mmHg and/or DBP < 110 mmHg) were randomized to indapamide 1.5 mg sustained release/amlodipine 5 mg SPC or amlodipine 5 mg/valsartan 80 mg SPC with conditional uptitration at week 6. Office blood pressure (BP) was assessed at baseline, weeks 6 and 12; ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring (ABPM/HBPM) at baseline and week 12.
Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups (57 years, 51% men, BP 160/92 mmHg). 233 patients were randomized to IndSR/Aml and 232 to amlodipine/valsartan, of whom 48 and 57% were uptitrated, respectively. After 12 weeks, office SBP/DBP decreased similarly with both treatments (-21/-8 vs. -20/-8 mmHg) leading to BP control in 50% and BP response in 70% of patients. Uptitration was effective (P < 0.001) with both regimens, in favour of IndSR/Aml (SBP/DBP -12/-6 vs. -7/-3 mmHg, respectively). ABPM (n = 273) and HBPM (n = 194) confirmed 24-h efficacy of both regimens. In the subgroup of patients with sustained uncontrolled hypertension assessed by ABPM (n = 216), office SBP/DBP decreased by -23/-13 vs. -18/-10 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.016/P = 0.135, post-hoc analysis). Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
Both regimens produced effective BP reductions confirmed by ABPM/HBPM. Both treatments were well tolerated, in accordance with the individual agents' safety profile.
EUDRA CT no. 2012-001690-84.
本项为时 12 周的国际、双盲、随机、对照临床试验旨在评估吲达帕胺缓释/氨氯地平单片复方制剂(SPC)在轻中度高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。
在服用氨氯地平 5mg4 周的导入期后,(SBP 为 150-180mmHg 且/或 DBP<110mmHg)患者被随机分配至吲达帕胺 1.5mg 缓释/氨氯地平 5mg SPC 或氨氯地平 5mg/缬沙坦 80mg SPC 组,并在第 6 周进行条件性滴定。基线、第 6 周和第 12 周时评估诊室血压(BP);基线和第 12 周时评估动态血压监测(ABPM)和家庭血压监测(HBPM)。
两组的基线特征相似(57 岁,51%为男性,BP 为 160/92mmHg)。233 例患者被随机分配至吲达帕胺缓释/氨氯地平组,232 例患者被随机分配至氨氯地平/缬沙坦组,其中 48%和 57%的患者分别进行了滴定。治疗 12 周后,两种治疗均使诊室 SBP/DBP 显著降低(-21/-8mmHg 与-20/-8mmHg),分别有 50%和 70%的患者血压得到控制,血压反应率分别为 70%和 50%。两种方案的滴定均有效(P<0.001),吲达帕胺缓释/氨氯地平组的 SBP/DBP 降幅更显著(-12/-6mmHg 与-7/-3mmHg)。ABPM(n=273)和 HBPM(n=194)证实了两种方案的 24 小时疗效。在 ABPM 评估的持续性未控高血压亚组患者中(n=216),诊室 SBP/DBP 分别降低了-23/-13mmHg 和-18/-10mmHg(P=0.016/P=0.135,事后分析)。两种治疗均普遍耐受良好。
ABPM/HBPM 证实两种方案均能有效降低血压。两种治疗均耐受良好,符合各单药的安全性特征。
EUDRA CT 编号:2012-001690-84。