Wang Li-Juan, Shi Xiao-Wei, Zhang Wei, Wang Tong, Zhou Shuai, Guo Chang-Qing
School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 May 25;32(5):462-468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.05.015.
To observe the effects of acupotomy intervention on the behavior, morphology and tensile mechanics of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) rabbits, and to explore the biomechanical effects of acupotomy on KOA.
Twenty-four New Zealand male rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: normal group, model group, electroacupuncture group and needle-knife group, with 6 rabbits in each group. In each model group, rabbit KOA model was established by fixing Videman's left hind limb in straight position for 6 weeks. In the electroacupuncture group, rats were treated left on Liang Qiu, Xue Hai, Nei Xi Yan and Wai Xi Yan 3 times a week for 3 weeks. In the acupotomology group, the left quadriceps femoris tendon was released with acupotomology, and the treatment was once a week for 3 weeks. Behavioral tests were performed using Lequesne MG knee joint evaluation method one week after the end of modeling and one week after the end of treatment, and HE staining and mechanical tests were performed one week after the end of treatment.
Behavioral observation before treatment showed that there were significant differences in local pain, gait response, joint activity and joint swelling between the normal group and the model group(<0.05), while there was no significant difference among the model group, electro-acupuncture group and needle-knife group(>0.05). After treatment, the results showed that there were significant differences in local pain, gait response, joint activity and joint swelling among model group, electro-acupuncture group and needle-knife group compared with normal group(<0.05); In local pain, the electro-acupuncture group was lower than the model group, and there was no significant difference(>0.05); there was significant difference between needle knife group and model group(<0.05); there was no significant difference between electro-acupuncture group and needle-knife group(>0.05). In gait change, there was significant difference between model group and electro-acupuncture group(<0.05); there was no significant difference between needle-knife group and model group(>0.05). In joint activity, there was significant difference between electro-acupuncture group and model group(<0.05). In joint swelling, compared with model group, there was significant difference on electro-acupuncture group and electro-knife group(<0.01), but there was no significant difference between the electro-acupuncture group and the needle-knife group(>0.05). Mechanics: Compared with the blank group, the ultimate load of the model group decreased significantly(<0.01), the ultimate load of the electro-acupuncture group decreased(>0.05), and the ultimate load of the needle-knife group increased(>0.05). Compared with the model group, the ultimate load of the electro-acupuncture group increased significantly(<0.05), and the ultimate load of the needle-knife group increased significantly (<0.01). Compared with the electro-acupuncture group, the ultimate load of the needle-knife group increased(>0.05). Compared with the blank group, the maximum displacement of the model group decreased significantly(<0.01), and the maximum displacement of the electro-acupuncture group and the needle-knife group decreased(>0.05). Compared with the model group, the maximum displacement of the electro-acupuncture group increased(>0.05), and the maximum displacement of the needle-knife group increased significantly(<0.05). Compared with the electro-acupuncture group, the maximum displacement of the needle-knife group increased(>0.05). There was no significant difference in stiffness among groups(>0.05).
Acupotomy intervention can significantly change the behavior and morphology, significantly improve the mechanical properties of quadriceps femoris tendon stretch, and exert its biomechanical effects to achieve the purpose of treating KOA.
观察针刀干预对膝骨关节炎(KOA)兔行为学、形态学及股四头肌拉伸力学的影响,探讨针刀治疗KOA的生物力学效应。
将24只新西兰雄性兔随机分为四组:正常组、模型组、电针组和针刀组,每组6只。各模型组采用Videman法将兔左后肢伸直固定6周建立KOA模型。电针组大鼠取左侧梁丘、血海、内膝眼、外膝眼,每周治疗3次,共3周。针刀组采用针刀松解左侧股四头肌肌腱,每周治疗1次,共3周。建模结束后1周及治疗结束后1周采用Lequesne MG膝关节评价法进行行为学测试,治疗结束后1周进行HE染色及力学测试。
治疗前行为学观察显示,正常组与模型组在局部疼痛、步态反应、关节活动及关节肿胀方面差异有统计学意义(<0.05),而模型组、电针组和针刀组之间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。治疗后结果显示,模型组、电针组和针刀组与正常组相比,在局部疼痛、步态反应、关节活动及关节肿胀方面差异有统计学意义(<0.05);在局部疼痛方面,电针组低于模型组,差异无统计学意义(>0.05);针刀组与模型组差异有统计学意义(<0.05);电针组与针刀组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在步态变化方面,模型组与电针组差异有统计学意义(<0.05);针刀组与模型组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在关节活动方面,电针组与模型组差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。在关节肿胀方面,与模型组相比,电针组和针刀组差异有统计学意义(<0.01),但电针组与针刀组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。力学方面:与空白组相比,模型组极限载荷显著降低(<0.01),电针组极限载荷降低(>0.05),针刀组极限载荷升高(>0.05)。与模型组相比,电针组极限载荷显著升高(<0.05),针刀组极限载荷显著升高(<0.01)。与电针组相比,针刀组极限载荷升高(>0.05)。与空白组相比,模型组最大位移显著降低(<0.01),电针组和针刀组最大位移降低(>0.05)。与模型组相比,电针组最大位移升高(>0.05),针刀组最大位移显著升高(<0.05)。与电针组相比,针刀组最大位移升高(>0.0