Eberhard-Karls University of Tuebingen, Competence Centre for University Teaching in Medicine, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Str. 10, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1628-5.
The implementation of competency-based intrinsic roles in undergraduate medical education remains a challenge. Faculties in transition need to be provided with generalizable curricular data in order to facilitate orientation on curricular roles' representation and to decide on steps of curriculum development. Explicit and implicit representation of objectives and multi-site agreement can be viewed as status indicators for the adoption of roles. Our aim was to develop a pragmatic cross-locational approach to capture roles' developmental status in an overview and prioritize strategic recommendations.
Based on the mapping data from six German medical faculties, the relationship between explicit and implicit curricular representation of role' objectives (weighting) and extent of programs' consent (agreement) was calculated. Data was visualized in a role-specific Matrix Map to analyse roles' implicit-explicit relation and risk-value potential. The matrix was combined with Roger's stages of innovation diffusion for differentiated interpretation of the developmental role status.
Entangling multi-site agreement and curricular weighting, the 4-Field-Matrix allows to assess objectives based on their current localization in a quadrant: "Disregard" (lower left) and "Progress" quadrant (upper left) reveal the diffusion period; "Potential" (lower right) and "Emphasis" quadrant (upper right) indicate the adoption period. The role patterns differ in curricular representation, progression and clarity: (1) Scholar: explicit/implicit - scattered across the matrix; most explicit objectives in "Progress". (2) Health Advocate: explicit - primarily in "Emphasis"; only role in which the explicit representation significantly exceeds the implicit. (3) Collaborator: explicit - mainly "Potential"; implicit - "Progress" or "Emphasis". (4) Professional: explicit - primarily "Potential" but also "Emphasis"; implicit - "Progress" and "Emphasis"; appears better adopted but scattered in weighting; high hidden curricula. (5) Manager: explicit and implicit - exclusively in "Potential", without signs of development. Role patterns correspond to evidences from literature. Exemplified with roles, quadrant-specific strategies and measures are suggested. Framework reviewers may gain information for discussion of critical content.
The Matrix Map enables to catch intuitively the status of intrinsic roles' profiles regarding role pattern, implicit-explicit relation and programs agreement. Thus, interpretation and informed discussions are fostered. Further target-oriented analyses and strategic developments can be conducted to enhance transparency and resource-efficiency.
在本科医学教育中实施基于能力的内在角色仍然是一个挑战。转型中的学院需要提供可推广的课程数据,以便于课程角色表现的定位,并决定课程发展的步骤。目标的明确和隐含表示以及多站点协议可以被视为采用角色的状态指标。我们的目的是开发一种实用的跨地点方法,以全面了解角色发展状况,并确定优先战略建议。
基于来自六所德国医学院的映射数据,计算了角色目标的明确和隐含课程表现(权重)与计划协议程度(协议)之间的关系。数据在角色特定的矩阵图中可视化,以分析角色的隐含-明确关系和风险价值潜力。该矩阵与罗杰的创新扩散阶段相结合,以便对发展中的角色状态进行差异化解释。
纠缠多站点协议和课程权重,四字段矩阵允许根据目标在象限中的当前位置对其进行评估:“忽视”(左下角)和“进展”象限(左上角)揭示了扩散期;“潜力”(右下角)和“强调”象限(右上角)表明了采用期。角色模式在课程表现、进展和清晰度上有所不同:(1)学者:明确/隐含-分散在矩阵中;“进展”中最明确的目标。(2)健康倡导者:明确-主要在“强调”中;唯一明确表示明显超过隐含表示的角色。(3)合作者:明确-主要是“潜力”;隐含-“进展”或“强调”。(4)专业人员:明确-主要是“潜力”,但也有“强调”;隐含-“进展”和“强调”;看起来更好地被采用,但在权重上分散;隐藏课程较多。(5)管理者:明确和隐含-仅在“潜力”中,没有发展迹象。角色模式与文献中的证据相对应。用角色举例说明了特定象限的策略和措施。框架审查员可以获得有关讨论关键内容的信息。
矩阵图可以直观地捕捉内在角色配置文件的内在角色状态,包括角色模式、隐含-明确关系和计划协议。因此,促进了解释和有针对性的讨论。可以进行进一步的目标导向分析和战略发展,以提高透明度和资源效率。