Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Aug;22(3):125-128. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300102. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Prediction models assist in stratifying and quantifying an individual's risk of developing a particular adverse outcome, and are widely used in cardiovascular and cancer medicine. Whether these approaches are accurate in predicting self-harm and suicide has been questioned. We searched for systematic reviews in the suicide risk assessment field, and identified three recent reviews that have examined current tools and models derived using machine learning approaches. In this clinical review, we present a critical appraisal of these reviews, and highlight three major limitations that are shared between them. First, structured tools are not compared with unstructured assessments routine in clinical practice. Second, they do not sufficiently consider a range of performance measures, including negative predictive value and calibration. Third, the potential role of these models as clinical adjuncts is not taken into consideration. We conclude by presenting the view that the current role of prediction models for self-harm and suicide is currently not known, and discuss some methodological issues and implications of some machine learning and other analytic techniques for clinical utility.
预测模型有助于对个体发生特定不良结局的风险进行分层和量化,在心血管疾病和癌症医学中得到了广泛应用。这些方法在预测自残和自杀方面的准确性一直受到质疑。我们在自杀风险评估领域进行了系统检索,确定了最近三篇审查了当前工具和使用机器学习方法得出的模型的综述。在本次临床综述中,我们对这些综述进行了批判性评估,并强调了它们之间存在的三个主要局限性。首先,并未将结构化工具与临床实践中常规使用的非结构化评估进行比较。其次,它们没有充分考虑一系列性能指标,包括阴性预测值和校准。第三,这些模型作为临床辅助手段的潜在作用没有得到考虑。最后,我们提出了这样的观点,即目前尚不清楚预测模型在自残和自杀中的作用,同时还讨论了一些机器学习和其他分析技术对临床实用性的方法学问题和影响。