• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切口疝修补术后患者报告的结局:对两家特级护理医院的163例患者进行的一项调查。

Patient reported outcome following incisional hernia repair: A survey on 163 patients at two maximum care hospitals.

作者信息

Paasch Christoph, Lorenz Eric, Anders Stefan, De Santo Gianluca, Boettge Katherina, Gauger Ulrich, Croner Roland, Strik Martin W

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.

Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Jun 15;44:5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.005. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.005
PMID:31249685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6586918/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are frequent complications after laparotomy (9-20%) and often need incisional hernia repair (IHR). In order to ensure wound healing and to therefore prevent postoperative short and long term morbidity carrying an abdominal binder (AB) and physical rest is frequently advised. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning clinical effects regarding these recommendations. Hence, we conducted a survey to analyze the patient reported outcome following IHR.

METHODS

From December 2017 to May 2018, we conducted a survey among 270 patients who underwent open and laparoscopic IHR at two maximum care hospitals. They were interviewed about their type of operation, postoperative treatment, recommendations, and outcome.

RESULTS

163 patients replied to the questionnaire. The average age was 63.2 ± 12 years. 74 patients were female and 89 were male. 32.6% of the patients reported an AB-induced immobility and 71.2% reported that the AB reduced pain after IHR. A prolonged period of physical rest and the use of an AB had no statistical significance on postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to our findings we assume that the AB may induce immobility and reduce postoperative pain. A prolonged period of physical rest and wearing an AB does not seem to have an impact on the postoperative outcome following IHR. Therefore, a shortened duration of physical rest and wearing an AB following IHR should be taken under consideration. To reveal more evidence on this topic further clinical trials are essential.

摘要

引言

腹壁切口疝是剖腹手术后常见的并发症(发生率为9%-20%),常需进行切口疝修补术(IHR)。为确保伤口愈合,从而预防术后短期和长期并发症,通常建议使用腹带(AB)并进行身体休息。然而,关于这些建议的临床效果缺乏证据。因此,我们进行了一项调查,以分析IHR术后患者报告的结果。

方法

2017年12月至2018年5月,我们对两家大型医院接受开放和腹腔镜IHR的270例患者进行了调查。询问了他们的手术类型、术后治疗、建议和结果。

结果

163例患者回复了问卷。平均年龄为63.2±12岁。女性74例,男性89例。32.6%的患者报告腹带导致活动不便,71.2%的患者报告腹带减轻了IHR术后的疼痛。长时间的身体休息和使用腹带对术后并发症无统计学意义。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,我们认为腹带可能导致活动不便并减轻术后疼痛。长时间的身体休息和佩戴腹带似乎对IHR术后的结果没有影响。因此,应考虑缩短IHR术后的身体休息时间和佩戴腹带的时间。为了揭示更多关于这个主题的证据,进一步的临床试验至关重要。

相似文献

1
Patient reported outcome following incisional hernia repair: A survey on 163 patients at two maximum care hospitals.切口疝修补术后患者报告的结局:对两家特级护理医院的163例患者进行的一项调查。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Jun 15;44:5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.005. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Postoperative-treatment following open incisional hernia repair: A survey and a review of literature.开放式切口疝修补术后的治疗:一项调查和文献回顾。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
The Effect of an Abdominal Binder on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair–A Multicenter, Randomized Pilot Trial (ABIHR-I) of the Intraperitoneal Onlay-Mesh Technique.腹带对腹腔镜切口疝修补术后疼痛的影响——腹腔内补片修补术的多中心、随机先导试验(ABIHR-I)。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Sep 17;118(37):607-613. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0250. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Comparison of different durations of physical activity restrictions following incisional hernia repair in sublay technique, the 3N6 trial: A prospective clinical trial.在腹膜前修补技术下进行切口疝修补术后不同时长身体活动限制的比较:3N6试验,一项前瞻性临床试验
Int J Surg Protoc. 2020 May 23;22:6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020.
5
A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开放式腹壁切口疝修补术的系统评价,随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.050. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Health Technology Assessment of laparoscopic compared to conventional surgery with and without mesh for incisional hernia repair regarding safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜手术与传统手术(有无补片)治疗切口疝修复术的安全性、有效性和成本效益的卫生技术评估。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2008 Mar 7;4:Doc01.
7
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.肥胖患者腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划临床结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1305-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5112-6. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.对来自Herniamed注册中心的4015例复发性切口疝修补术的分析:危险因素和结果。
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜与开放式切口疝修补术的随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):259-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466.
10
Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术术后切口疝修补的发生率:一项全国范围内 17717 例患者的分析。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1627-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05375-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There a Clinical Benefit of Abdominal Binders After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.腹部手术后使用腹带是否具有临床益处:一项系统文献综述
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Oct 17;3:13506. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13506. eCollection 2024.
2
The effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcome after open incisional hernia repair in sublay technique: a multicenter, randomized pilot trial (ABIHR-II).腹带在开放式切口疝修补术(Sublay 技术)后对术后结果的影响:一项多中心、随机试点试验(ABIHR-II)。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02838-4. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
The Effect of an Abdominal Binder on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair–A Multicenter, Randomized Pilot Trial (ABIHR-I) of the Intraperitoneal Onlay-Mesh Technique.腹带对腹腔镜切口疝修补术后疼痛的影响——腹腔内补片修补术的多中心、随机先导试验(ABIHR-I)。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Sep 17;118(37):607-613. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0250. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Comparison of different durations of physical activity restrictions following incisional hernia repair in sublay technique, the 3N6 trial: A prospective clinical trial.在腹膜前修补技术下进行切口疝修补术后不同时长身体活动限制的比较:3N6试验,一项前瞻性临床试验
Int J Surg Protoc. 2020 May 23;22:6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative-treatment following open incisional hernia repair: A survey and a review of literature.开放式切口疝修补术后的治疗:一项调查和文献回顾。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery.STROCSS 声明:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair.内镜下迷你/小切口腹膜前修补技术(EMILOS)——一种腹疝修补新技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1522-0. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
4
Abdominal binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery - a systematic review.腹带可能会减轻大腹部手术后的疼痛并改善身体功能——一项系统综述。
Dan Med J. 2014 Nov;61(11):A4941.
5
Randomized clinical trial on the postoperative use of an abdominal binder after laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.腹腔镜脐疝和上腹部疝修补术后使用腹部束带的随机临床试验。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1289-6. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
6
Abdominal binders after laparotomy: review of the literature and French survey of policies.剖腹术后使用腹带:文献回顾与法国政策调查。
Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):501-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1264-2. Epub 2014 May 17.
7
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝的指南(国际内镜疝学会[IEHS])——第2部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):353-79. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5.
8
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.腹腔镜治疗腹壁下和切口疝的指南(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)-第 1 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):2-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])-Part III.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝的指南(国际内镜疝学会[IEHS])-第三部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):380-404. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3172-4. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.系统评价和荟萃分析使用轻量型与重量型网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7718. Epub 2011 Oct 31.