Menceloglu Melisa, Grabowecky Marcia, Suzuki Satoru
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2732-2744. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01798-1.
The timing and the sensory modality of behaviorally relevant events often vary predictably, so that it is beneficial to adapt the sensory system to their statistical regularities. Indeed, statistical information about target timing and/or sensory modality modulates behavioral responses-called expectation effects. Responses are also facilitated by short-term repetitions of target timing and/or sensory modality-called priming effects. We examined how the expectation and priming effects on target timing (short vs. long cue-to-target interval) and target modality (auditory vs. visual) interacted. Temporal expectation was manipulated across blocks, while modality expectation was manipulated across participants. Responses were faster when targets were presented at the expected timing and/or in the expected modality in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality expectation operate relatively independently. Similarly, responses were faster when the timing and/or modality of targets was repeated across trials in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality priming operate relatively independently. Importantly, the interactions between expectation and priming were domain specific. In the temporal domain, temporal-expectation effects were observed only when temporal-priming effects were absent. In the modality domain, modality-priming effects predominated for auditory targets whereas modality-expectation effects predominated for visual targets. Thus, the interactions between probability-driven expectation and stimulus-driven priming processes appear to be controlled separately for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific temporal intervals and for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific sensory modalities. These results may suggest that the sensory system concurrently optimizes attentional priorities within temporal and sensory-modality domains.
与行为相关事件的时间和感觉模态通常会以可预测的方式变化,因此使感觉系统适应它们的统计规律是有益的。实际上,关于目标时间和/或感觉模态的统计信息会调节行为反应——称为期望效应。目标时间和/或感觉模态的短期重复也会促进反应——称为启动效应。我们研究了对目标时间(短与长的提示到目标间隔)和目标模态(听觉与视觉)的期望和启动效应是如何相互作用的。跨组操纵时间期望,而跨参与者操纵模态期望。当目标以相加的方式在预期时间和/或预期模态呈现时,反应更快,这表明时间和模态期望相对独立地起作用。同样,当目标的时间和/或模态在试验中以相加的方式重复时,反应更快,这表明时间和模态启动相对独立地起作用。重要的是,期望和启动之间的相互作用是领域特定的。在时间领域,仅当不存在时间启动效应时才观察到时间期望效应。在模态领域,听觉目标的模态启动效应占主导,而视觉目标的模态期望效应占主导。因此,概率驱动的期望和刺激驱动的启动过程之间的相互作用似乎对于将注意力引向特定时间间隔的机制和将注意力引向特定感觉模态的机制是分别控制的。这些结果可能表明感觉系统同时在时间和感觉模态领域内优化注意力优先级。