Suppr超能文献

概率驱动和刺激驱动的注意力对时间和感觉模态的定向

Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.

作者信息

Menceloglu Melisa, Grabowecky Marcia, Suzuki Satoru

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2732-2744. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01798-1.

Abstract

The timing and the sensory modality of behaviorally relevant events often vary predictably, so that it is beneficial to adapt the sensory system to their statistical regularities. Indeed, statistical information about target timing and/or sensory modality modulates behavioral responses-called expectation effects. Responses are also facilitated by short-term repetitions of target timing and/or sensory modality-called priming effects. We examined how the expectation and priming effects on target timing (short vs. long cue-to-target interval) and target modality (auditory vs. visual) interacted. Temporal expectation was manipulated across blocks, while modality expectation was manipulated across participants. Responses were faster when targets were presented at the expected timing and/or in the expected modality in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality expectation operate relatively independently. Similarly, responses were faster when the timing and/or modality of targets was repeated across trials in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality priming operate relatively independently. Importantly, the interactions between expectation and priming were domain specific. In the temporal domain, temporal-expectation effects were observed only when temporal-priming effects were absent. In the modality domain, modality-priming effects predominated for auditory targets whereas modality-expectation effects predominated for visual targets. Thus, the interactions between probability-driven expectation and stimulus-driven priming processes appear to be controlled separately for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific temporal intervals and for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific sensory modalities. These results may suggest that the sensory system concurrently optimizes attentional priorities within temporal and sensory-modality domains.

摘要

与行为相关事件的时间和感觉模态通常会以可预测的方式变化,因此使感觉系统适应它们的统计规律是有益的。实际上,关于目标时间和/或感觉模态的统计信息会调节行为反应——称为期望效应。目标时间和/或感觉模态的短期重复也会促进反应——称为启动效应。我们研究了对目标时间(短与长的提示到目标间隔)和目标模态(听觉与视觉)的期望和启动效应是如何相互作用的。跨组操纵时间期望,而跨参与者操纵模态期望。当目标以相加的方式在预期时间和/或预期模态呈现时,反应更快,这表明时间和模态期望相对独立地起作用。同样,当目标的时间和/或模态在试验中以相加的方式重复时,反应更快,这表明时间和模态启动相对独立地起作用。重要的是,期望和启动之间的相互作用是领域特定的。在时间领域,仅当不存在时间启动效应时才观察到时间期望效应。在模态领域,听觉目标的模态启动效应占主导,而视觉目标的模态期望效应占主导。因此,概率驱动的期望和刺激驱动的启动过程之间的相互作用似乎对于将注意力引向特定时间间隔的机制和将注意力引向特定感觉模态的机制是分别控制的。这些结果可能表明感觉系统同时在时间和感觉模态领域内优化注意力优先级。

相似文献

1
Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2732-2744. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01798-1.
3
The role of multisensory interplay in enabling temporal expectations.
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:130-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Distinct Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Attention and Expectation Guide Perceptual Inference in a Multisensory World.
J Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;39(12):2301-2312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2873-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
8
Attentional orienting across the sensory modalities.
Brain Cogn. 2008 Feb;66(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
9
Independent effects of temporal expectation and stimulus intensity in audition.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1520-32. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0491-4.
10
Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 16;42(46):8729-8741. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0658-22.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Revealing the effects of temporal orienting of attention on response conflict using continuous movements.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1463-1478. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02235-4. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
Rhythm Violation Enhances Auditory-Evoked Responses to the Extent of Overriding Sensory Adaptation in Passive Listening.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Sep;32(9):1654-1671. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01578. Epub 2020 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-modal decoupling in temporal attention between audition and touch.
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1626-1639. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1023-6. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-48. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.141. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
3
Temporal orienting precedes intersensory attention and has opposing effects on early evoked brain activity.
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:230-239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
Temporal expectation weights visual signals over auditory signals.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):416-422. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1109-3.
7
Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
Foreperiod priming in temporal preparation: testing current models of sequential effects.
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1485-502. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0663-x.
10
Cross-modal decoupling in temporal attention.
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Jun;39(12):2089-97. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12563. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验