• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在时长感知方面,听觉比视觉占主导地位,这与显著性、注意力和时间辨别能力无关。

Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

作者信息

Ortega Laura, Guzman-Martinez Emmanuel, Grabowecky Marcia, Suzuki Satoru

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1485-502. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0663-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0663-x
PMID:24806403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4096074/
Abstract

Whereas the visual modality tends to dominate over the auditory modality in bimodal spatial perception, the auditory modality tends to dominate over the visual modality in bimodal temporal perception. Recent results suggest that the visual modality dominates bimodal spatial perception because spatial discriminability is typically greater for the visual than for the auditory modality; accordingly, visual dominance is eliminated or reversed when visual-spatial discriminability is reduced by degrading visual stimuli to be equivalent or inferior to auditory spatial discriminability. Thus, for spatial perception, the modality that provides greater discriminability dominates. Here, we ask whether auditory dominance in duration perception is similarly explained by factors that influence the relative quality of auditory and visual signals. In contrast to the spatial results, the auditory modality dominated over the visual modality in bimodal duration perception even when the auditory signal was clearly weaker, when the auditory signal was ignored (i.e., the visual signal was selectively attended), and when the temporal discriminability was equivalent for the auditory and visual signals. Thus, unlike spatial perception, where the modality carrying more discriminable signals dominates, duration perception seems to be mandatorily linked to auditory processing under most circumstances.

摘要

在双模式空间感知中,视觉模态往往比听觉模态占主导地位;而在双模式时间感知中,听觉模态往往比视觉模态占主导地位。最近的研究结果表明,视觉模态在双模式空间感知中占主导地位是因为视觉的空间辨别能力通常比听觉更强;因此,当通过将视觉刺激降级到与听觉空间辨别能力相当或更低的水平来降低视觉空间辨别能力时,视觉主导地位就会消除或逆转。所以,对于空间感知而言,提供更高辨别能力的模态占主导地位。在此,我们要探讨在时长感知中听觉占主导地位是否同样可以由影响听觉和视觉信号相对质量的因素来解释。与空间感知的结果不同,在双模式时长感知中,即使听觉信号明显较弱、听觉信号被忽略(即选择性地关注视觉信号)以及听觉和视觉信号的时间辨别能力相当时,听觉模态仍比视觉模态占主导地位。因此,与携带更多可辨别信号的模态占主导地位的空间感知不同,在大多数情况下,时长感知似乎必然与听觉处理相关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/7d695be23cdf/nihms-593699-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/db4576b980f6/nihms-593699-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2bc2df6ac5f4/nihms-593699-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2c6573bffd82/nihms-593699-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/998dc5b1b235/nihms-593699-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2b6e1c834569/nihms-593699-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/42eacdf09a90/nihms-593699-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2c8afdb45890/nihms-593699-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/7d695be23cdf/nihms-593699-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/db4576b980f6/nihms-593699-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2bc2df6ac5f4/nihms-593699-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2c6573bffd82/nihms-593699-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/998dc5b1b235/nihms-593699-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2b6e1c834569/nihms-593699-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/42eacdf09a90/nihms-593699-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/2c8afdb45890/nihms-593699-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b947/4096074/7d695be23cdf/nihms-593699-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.在时长感知方面,听觉比视觉占主导地位,这与显著性、注意力和时间辨别能力无关。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1485-502. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0663-x.
2
Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.听觉优势于视觉在时间间隔感知中的体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1933-z. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
3
Audio-visual integration in temporal perception.时间感知中的视听整合。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00128-4.
4
Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.注意模态间的转换:视觉优势的进一步证据。
Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):255-67. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
5
Perceptual learning in temporal discrimination: asymmetric cross-modal transfer from audition to vision.时间辨别中的知觉学习:来自听觉到视觉的非对称跨模态转移。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;221(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3162-0. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
6
On the interplay of visuospatial and audiotemporal dominance: Evidence from a multimodal kappa effect.关于视觉空间优势与听觉时间优势的相互作用:来自多模态kappa效应的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):535-552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1437-z.
7
Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.听觉和视听刺激对左右优势效应的影响。
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):400-10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0518-4. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
8
See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.听见我所听?在听觉和视觉节奏中感知节拍。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3114-8. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.时间和空间上的跨模态交互:听觉对半侧空间忽视中视觉注意的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368.
10
Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.跨模态注意转换:时间辨别任务中的听觉优势
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Presentation time shapes perceived room size in visual and auditory modalities.呈现时间在视觉和听觉模态中塑造了对房间大小的感知。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00644-3.
2
The multisensory control of sequential actions.连续动作的多感官控制。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Dec 5;243(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06962-0.
3
Measuring the perception and metacognition of time.测量时间的感知和元认知。

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral Indices of Multisensory Integration: Orientation to Visual Cues is Affected by Auditory Stimuli.多感觉整合的行为指标:对视觉线索的定向受听觉刺激的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1989 Winter;1(1):12-24. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.12.
2
Flicker adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to temporal dilation.低水平皮层视觉神经元的闪烁适应有助于时间扩张。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1380-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029495. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
3
Auditory Stimulus Timing Influences Perceived duration of Co-Occurring Visual Stimuli.
J Vis. 2024 Mar 1;24(3):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.3.5.
4
Visual movement impairs duration discrimination at short intervals.视觉运动在短时间间隔内会损害对时间的辨别能力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jan;77(1):57-69. doi: 10.1177/17470218231156542. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Weighted Integration of Duration Information Across Visual and Auditory Modality Is Influenced by Modality-Specific Attention.跨视觉和听觉通道的持续时间信息的加权整合受通道特异性注意的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 7;15:725449. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.725449. eCollection 2021.
6
Neuronal activity in the monkey prefrontal cortex during a duration discrimination task with visual and auditory cues.猴子前额叶皮层在视觉和听觉线索的持续时间辨别任务中的神经元活动。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 1;11(1):17520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97094-w.
7
Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?跨感觉和内感觉的时间序列辨别:我们真的能听到我们看到的吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3089-3098. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05654-4. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.心理生物学反应表明视听噪声对语音识别的挑战存在差异。
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):268-277. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000755.
9
Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.概率驱动和刺激驱动的注意力对时间和感觉模态的定向
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2732-2744. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01798-1.
10
Superior Visual Timing Sensitivity in Auditory But Not Visual World Class Drum Corps Experts.世界级军乐团专家在听觉而非视觉领域具有更优越的视觉时间敏感性。
eNeuro. 2018 Dec 14;5(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0241-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
听觉刺激时间影响同时出现的视觉刺激的感知持续时间。
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 8;2:215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00215. eCollection 2011.
4
Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.初级听觉皮层在时间估计中的模态独立性作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):465-71. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2577-3. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
5
Crossmodal duration perception involves perceptual grouping, temporal ventriloquism, and variable internal clock rates.跨通道持续时间感知涉及知觉分组、时间视错觉和可变的内部时钟速率。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):219-36. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0010-9.
6
Attention and the crossmodal construction of space.注意与跨模态空间构建。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Jul 1;2(7):254-62. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01188-7.
7
Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.听觉优势于视觉在时间间隔感知中的体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1933-z. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
8
Modality and intermittency effects on time estimation.模态和间歇性对时间估计的影响。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
9
The role of temporal-masking patterns in the determination of subjective duration and loudness for ramped and damped sounds.时间掩蔽模式在确定渐变和衰减声音的主观时长及响度方面的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3772-83. doi: 10.1121/1.2999342.
10
Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: attention alone does not explain why the discs are bouncing.视听弹跳诱导效应:仅靠注意力无法解释光盘为何弹跳。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):235-43. doi: 10.1037/a0013031.