The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 28;9(6):e030271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030271.
Suboptimal electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) in labour using cardiotocography (CTG) has been identified as one of the most common causes of avoidable harm in maternity care. Training staff is a frequently proposed solution to reduce harm. However, current approaches to training are heterogeneous in content and format, making it difficult to assess effectiveness. Technological solutions, such as digital decision support, have not yet demonstrated improved outcomes. Effective improvement strategies require in-depth understanding of the technical and social mechanisms underpinning the EFM process. The aim of this study is to advance current knowledge of the types of errors, hazards and failure modes in the process of classifying, interpreting and responding to CTG traces. This study is part of a broader research programme aimed at developing and testing an intervention to improve intrapartum EFM.
The study is organised into two workstreams. First, we will conduct observations and interviews in three UK maternity units to gain an in-depth understanding of how intrapartum EFM is performed in routine clinical practice. Data analysis will combine the insights of an ethnographic approach (focused on the social norms and interactions, values and meanings that appear to be linked with the process of EFM) with a systems thinking approach (focused on modelling processes, actors and their interactions). Second, we will use risk analysis techniques to develop a framework of the errors, hazards and failure modes that affect intrapartum EFM.
This study has been approved by the West Midlands-South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee, reference number: 18/WM/0292. Dissemination will take the form of academic articles in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, along with tailored communication with various stakeholders in maternity care.
在产程中使用胎心监护(CTG)时,电子胎心监护效果不理想已被确定为产妇保健中可避免的伤害的最常见原因之一。培训工作人员是减少伤害的常用解决方案。然而,目前的培训方法在内容和形式上存在差异,使得评估其效果变得困难。技术解决方案,如数字决策支持,尚未证明能够改善结果。有效的改进策略需要深入了解支持胎心监护过程的技术和社会机制。本研究旨在深入了解分类、解释和响应 CTG 迹线过程中的错误、危险和失效模式的类型。这项研究是一个更广泛的研究计划的一部分,旨在开发和测试一种改善产时胎心监护的干预措施。
该研究分为两个工作流程。首先,我们将在三个英国产科病房进行观察和访谈,深入了解产程中胎心监护在常规临床实践中的实施情况。数据分析将结合民族志方法(侧重于似乎与胎心监护过程相关的社会规范和相互作用、价值观和意义)和系统思维方法(侧重于建模过程、参与者及其相互作用)的见解。其次,我们将使用风险分析技术来开发一个影响产时胎心监护的错误、危险和失效模式的框架。
这项研究已获得西米德兰兹-南伯明翰研究伦理委员会的批准,参考号为 18/WM/0292。传播将采取在同行评议期刊和会议上发表学术文章以及与产妇保健各个利益相关者进行定制沟通的形式。