Columbus Lauren, Aqib Ayma, Pack Rachael, Banner Harrison, Taylor Taryn
Department of Midwifery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 May 7;14(1):243-254. doi: 10.5334/pme.1651. eCollection 2025.
Preventable adverse perinatal outcomes have a devastating impact on patients and providers and form the basis of many quality improvement (QI) and patient safety initiatives in birthing unit teams, including fetal health surveillance (FHS) training programs. Birthing unit staff attitudes regarding the role of interprofessional relationships on FHS decisions remain largely unexplored with respect to preventable adverse outcomes.
In this intervention-primed, constructivist grounded theory study, members across all five professions providing intrapartum care at one academic centre attended an interprofessional workshop on improving their FHS interpretation, response, communication, and teamwork skills. Twenty-three birthing unit team members across midwifery, obstetrics, family medicine, nursing, and obstetrical trainees were purposively sampled and completed semi-structured interviews. Self-serving bias theory was used as a sensitizing concept to explore the social phenomena observed.
Birthing unit staff constructed a self-schema of their role in FHS management that was more flattering than the person-schema created by their colleagues about them. The schemas encoded four categories of information that included (1) Identifying the offender, (2) Assigning blame (3) Aligning with the "right" philosophy of care, and (4) Defending one's profession. Participants demonstrated distorted perceptual processes where they described errors other team members had made with ease but struggled to acknowledge their own role in poor outcomes.
Dissonant schemas can be barriers to the accurate self-assessment of one's skills and have significant implications for interprofessional team competence. QI initiatives may be of limited efficacy given these findings, but addressing these distorted perceptual processes in QI initiatives could improve team performance.
可预防的围产期不良结局对患者和医护人员有着毁灭性的影响,也是分娩单元团队中许多质量改进(QI)和患者安全举措的基础,包括胎儿健康监测(FHS)培训项目。关于跨专业关系在FHS决策中的作用,分娩单元工作人员的态度在可预防的不良结局方面仍 largely unexplored。
在这项以干预为导向的建构主义扎根理论研究中,在一个学术中心提供产时护理的所有五个专业的成员参加了一个跨专业研讨会,以提高他们的FHS解读、应对、沟通和团队合作技能。从助产、产科、家庭医学、护理和产科实习生中有意抽取了23名分娩单元团队成员,并完成了半结构化访谈。自我服务偏差理论被用作一个敏感概念来探索所观察到的社会现象。
分娩单元工作人员构建了一个关于他们在FHS管理中角色的自我图式,这个图式比他们的同事为他们创建的人物图式更讨人喜欢。这些图式编码了四类信息,包括(1)识别冒犯者,(2)归咎责任,(3)与“正确”的护理理念保持一致,以及(4)捍卫自己的职业。参与者表现出扭曲的认知过程,他们轻松地描述了其他团队成员所犯的错误,但却难以承认自己在不良结局中的作用。
不一致的图式可能成为准确自我评估个人技能的障碍,并对跨专业团队能力产生重大影响。鉴于这些发现,QI举措的效果可能有限,但在QI举措中解决这些扭曲的认知过程可以提高团队绩效。