Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:272-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
Patient success with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires adequate health literacy to understand the disease and rationale for treatment. We hypothesized that individuals receiving treatment for AF would have increased knowledge about AF and that such knowledge would be modified by education and income.
We enrolled adults with AF receiving anticoagulation at ambulatory clinic sites. Participants responded to survey items encompassing the definitions of AF and stroke, the rationale for anticoagulation, and an estimation of their annual stroke risk. We examined responses in relation to household income and education in multivariable-adjusted models.
We enrolled 339 individuals (age 72.0 ± 10.1; 43% women) with predominantly lower annual income ($20-49,999, n = 99, 29.2%) and a range of educational attainment (high school or vocational, n = 117, 34.5%). Participants demonstrated moderate AF knowledge (1.7 ± 0.6; range 0-2) but limited knowledge about anticoagulation (1.3 ± 0.7; range 0-3) or stroke (1.5 ± 0.8; range 0-3). Income was not associated with improvement in AF (P = 0.32 for trend), anticoagulation (P = 0.27) or stroke knowledge (P = 0.26). Individuals with bachelor or graduate degree had greater AF (1.8 ± 0.5) and stroke (1.6 ± 0.8) knowledge relative to those with high school or vocational training (1.4 ± 0.7 and 1.2 ± 0.9; P ≪ 0.01, both estimates). Education was not associated with understanding the rationale for anticoagulation. Most participants (230, 68%) estimated their annual stroke risk as ≥15%.
We identified consistent, fundamental gaps in disease-specific knowledge in a cohort of adults receiving treatment for non-valvular AF. Improved patient understanding of this complex and chronic disease may enhance shared decision making, patient engagement, anticoagulation adherence, and clinical outcomes in AF.
心房颤动(AF)患者的成功治疗需要具备足够的健康素养,以理解疾病和治疗的原理。我们假设接受 AF 治疗的个体将对 AF 有更多的了解,并且这种知识将通过教育和收入进行修正。
我们招募了在门诊诊所接受抗凝治疗的 AF 成年患者。参与者回答了涵盖 AF 和中风定义、抗凝治疗原理以及他们每年中风风险估计的调查项目。我们在多变量调整模型中检查了与家庭收入和教育相关的反应。
我们招募了 339 名年龄为 72.0±10.1 岁(43%为女性)的个体,其中大部分家庭收入较低(20-49999 美元,n=99,29.2%),教育程度也参差不齐(高中或职业学校,n=117,34.5%)。参与者的 AF 知识水平中等(1.7±0.6;范围 0-2),但对抗凝(1.3±0.7;范围 0-3)或中风(1.5±0.8;范围 0-3)的知识有限。收入与 AF(P=0.32 趋势)、抗凝(P=0.27)或中风知识(P=0.26)的改善无关。拥有学士或研究生学位的个体比拥有高中或职业培训的个体对 AF(1.8±0.5 和 1.4±0.7;P≪0.01,两种估计值)和中风(1.6±0.8 和 1.2±0.9;P≪0.01,两种估计值)的知识有更大的了解。教育与对抗凝治疗的原理的理解无关。大多数参与者(230 名,68%)估计他们的年中风风险≥15%。
我们在接受非瓣膜性 AF 治疗的成年患者队列中发现了与疾病特异性知识相关的一致且基本的差距。提高患者对这种复杂和慢性疾病的认识,可以增强共同决策、患者参与、抗凝依从性和 AF 的临床结果。