• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大尺度粗糙元件上的紊流:正面和平面实度对紊流统计量和结构的影响。

Turbulent Flow Over Large Roughness Elements: Effect of Frontal and Plan Solidity on Turbulence Statistics and Structure.

作者信息

Placidi M, Ganapathisubramani B

机构信息

1City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB UK.

2University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.

出版信息

Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2018;167(1):99-121. doi: 10.1007/s10546-017-0317-3. Epub 2017 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10546-017-0317-3
PMID:31258157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6566281/
Abstract

Wind-tunnel experiments were carried out on fully-rough boundary layers with large roughness ( , where is the height of the roughness elements and is the boundary-layer thickness). Twelve different surface conditions were created by using LEGO™ bricks of uniform height. Six cases are tested for a fixed plan solidity ( ) with variations in frontal density ( ), while the other six cases have varying for fixed . Particle image velocimetry and floating-element drag-balance measurements were performed. The current results complement those contained in Placidi and Ganapathisubramani (J Fluid Mech 782:541-566, 2015), extending the previous analysis to the turbulence statistics and spatial structure. Results indicate that mean velocity profiles in defect form agree with Townsend's similarity hypothesis with varying , however, the agreement is worse for cases with varying . The streamwise and wall-normal turbulent stresses, as well as the Reynolds shear stresses, show a lack of similarity across most examined cases. This suggests that the critical height of the roughness for which outer-layer similarity holds depends not only on the height of the roughness, but also on the local wall morphology. A new criterion based on shelter solidity, defined as the sheltered plan area per unit wall-parallel area, which is similar to the 'effective shelter area' in Raupach and Shaw (Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79-90, 1982), is found to capture the departure of the turbulence statistics from outer-layer similarity. Despite this lack of similarity reported in the turbulence statistics, proper orthogonal decomposition analysis, as well as two-point spatial correlations, show that some form of universal flow structure is present, as all cases exhibit virtually identical proper orthogonal decomposition mode shapes and correlation fields. Finally, reduced models based on proper orthogonal decomposition reveal that the small scales of the turbulence play a significant role in assessing outer-layer similarity.

摘要

在具有大粗糙度( ,其中 是粗糙度元件的高度, 是边界层厚度)的充分粗糙边界层上进行了风洞实验。通过使用高度均匀的乐高积木创造了十二种不同的表面条件。对于固定的平面实度( ),测试了六种情况,其迎流密度( )有所变化,而另外六种情况则在固定 时 有所变化。进行了粒子图像测速和浮动元件阻力平衡测量。当前结果补充了普拉西迪和加纳帕蒂苏布拉马尼(《流体力学杂志》782:541 - 566,2015)中的结果,将先前的分析扩展到了湍流统计和空间结构。结果表明,缺陷形式的平均速度剖面在 变化时与汤森德相似性假设相符,然而,在 变化的情况下一致性较差。流向和壁法向湍流应力以及雷诺剪应力在大多数研究案例中缺乏相似性。这表明外层相似性成立的粗糙度临界高度不仅取决于粗糙度的高度,还取决于局部壁面形态。发现了一种基于遮蔽实度的新准则,定义为单位壁面平行面积的遮蔽平面面积,它类似于劳帕克和肖(《边界层气象学》22:79 - 90,1982)中的“有效遮蔽面积”,该准则能够捕捉湍流统计与外层相似性的偏差。尽管在湍流统计中报告了这种缺乏相似性的情况,但适当正交分解分析以及两点空间相关性表明存在某种形式的通用流动结构,因为所有案例都呈现出几乎相同的适当正交分解模态形状和相关场。最后,基于适当正交分解的简化模型表明,湍流的小尺度在评估外层相似性方面起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/216af4ca56ea/10546_2017_317_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/b20d6e167968/10546_2017_317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/bd9ce7378b37/10546_2017_317_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/df666f7ee284/10546_2017_317_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/75ee233a7b52/10546_2017_317_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/41871c6f8313/10546_2017_317_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/19d18888d2ec/10546_2017_317_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/0d42c6f43a09/10546_2017_317_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/0dc6177031da/10546_2017_317_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/d0c2f6728463/10546_2017_317_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/108da3b96fe7/10546_2017_317_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/29ebb6fcc807/10546_2017_317_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/73b8f32817af/10546_2017_317_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/4ef515b0bf52/10546_2017_317_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/7c627db3784e/10546_2017_317_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/216af4ca56ea/10546_2017_317_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/b20d6e167968/10546_2017_317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/bd9ce7378b37/10546_2017_317_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/df666f7ee284/10546_2017_317_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/75ee233a7b52/10546_2017_317_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/41871c6f8313/10546_2017_317_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/19d18888d2ec/10546_2017_317_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/0d42c6f43a09/10546_2017_317_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/0dc6177031da/10546_2017_317_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/d0c2f6728463/10546_2017_317_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/108da3b96fe7/10546_2017_317_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/29ebb6fcc807/10546_2017_317_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/73b8f32817af/10546_2017_317_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/4ef515b0bf52/10546_2017_317_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/7c627db3784e/10546_2017_317_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d558/6566281/216af4ca56ea/10546_2017_317_Fig15_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Turbulent Flow Over Large Roughness Elements: Effect of Frontal and Plan Solidity on Turbulence Statistics and Structure.大尺度粗糙元件上的紊流:正面和平面实度对紊流统计量和结构的影响。
Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2018;167(1):99-121. doi: 10.1007/s10546-017-0317-3. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
2
Wind resource assessment in heterogeneous terrain.复杂地形中的风资源评估。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Apr 13;375(2091). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0109.
3
Adverse-Pressure-Gradient Effects on Turbulent Boundary Layers: Statistics and Flow-Field Organization.逆压梯度对湍流边界层的影响:统计特性与流场结构
Flow Turbul Combust. 2017;99(3):589-612. doi: 10.1007/s10494-017-9869-z. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Characteristic scales of Townsend's wall-attached eddies.汤森德壁面附着涡的特征尺度。
J Fluid Mech. 2019 Jun 10;868:698-725. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2019.209.
5
Turbulent flow in smooth and rough pipes.光滑管和粗糙管中的湍流。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Mar 15;365(1852):699-714. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1939.
6
Body surface adaptations to boundary-layer dynamics.体表对边界层动力学的适应性变化。
Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1995;49:1-20.
7
Investigation of the Turbulent Boundary Layer Structure over a Sparsely Spaced Biomimetic Spine-Covered Protrusion Surface.稀疏排列的仿生脊柱覆盖突出表面上湍流边界层结构的研究。
ACS Omega. 2021 May 28;6(22):14220-14229. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00937. eCollection 2021 Jun 8.
8
Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics.硅藻类软泥污垢对湍流边界层水动力的粗糙度效应。
Biofouling. 2018 Oct;34(9):976-988. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2018.1517867. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
9
Non-equilibrium turbulence scalings and self-similarity in turbulent planar jets.湍流平面射流中的非平衡湍流标度与自相似性
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019 May;475(2225):20190038. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0038. Epub 2019 May 8.
10
Analysis of Thermal and Roughness Effects on the Turbulent Characteristics of Experimentally Simulated Boundary Layers in a Wind Tunnel.风洞中实验模拟边界层湍流特性的热效应和粗糙度效应分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095134.