Adam Jean-Philippe, Trudeau Chloé, Pelchat-White Charlotte, Deschamps Marie-Lou, Labrosse Philippe, Langevin Marie-Claude, Crevier Benoît
, BPharm, MSc, BCPS, BCOP, is with the Pharmacy Department, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), and the Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montréal, Quebec.
, PharmD, MSc, was, at time of this study, a pharmacy student in the Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. She is now with the Pharmacy Department, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 May-Jun;72(3):194-201. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
In many studies on documentation, the data are self-reported, which makes it difficult to know the actual level of documentation by pharmacists in patients' medical records. The literature assessing documentation by clinical pharmacists in health care centres is limited.
To assess the level of documentation in patients' medical records by clinical pharmacists at one large urban hospital.
This retrospective observational study included all patients who were followed by a clinical pharmacist during their stay in the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal between July 1 and October 31, 2016. The primary outcome, the level of documentation in patients' medical records, was categorized as minimal, sufficient, or extensive. The quality of notes and the impact of pharmacy students and residents on documentation were evaluated as secondary outcomes.
A total of 779 patient charts from 4 inpatient units were included in the analysis. Of these, 563 (72.3%) were considered to have minimal documentation (at least 1 intervention described in writing), 432 (55.5%) had sufficient documentation (at least 1 note written during the patient's hospitalization), and 81 (10.4%) had extensive documentation (appropriate number of notes in relation to duration of hospitalization). Medication reconciliation performed by pharmacists at the time of admission was documented in 696 (89.3%) of patients' records. The presence of students or residents on a clinical unit was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of charts with at least 1 follow-up note (23.6% [120/508] with students/residents versus 12.5% [34/271] without students/residents; < 0.001) and the mean number of followup notes (0.59 versus 0.23, respectively; < 0.001) but had no effect on other variables. Of a total of 777 notes written by a pharmacist, the overall conformity with pre-established criteria was 56.8% (441/777), and conformity was 43.4% (139/320), 75.1% (272/362), and 31.6% (30/95) for admission, follow-up, and discharge notes, respectively.
Documentation by clinical pharmacists in patients' medical records could be improved to achieve the stated goal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, that all significant clinical recommendations or interventions should be documented.
在许多关于记录的研究中,数据是自我报告的,这使得了解药剂师在患者病历中的实际记录水平变得困难。评估医疗保健中心临床药剂师记录情况的文献有限。
评估一家大型城市医院临床药剂师在患者病历中的记录水平。
这项回顾性观察研究纳入了2016年7月1日至10月31日期间在蒙特利尔大学中心医院住院期间由临床药剂师跟踪的所有患者。主要结果,即患者病历中的记录水平,分为最少、足够或广泛。笔记质量以及药学专业学生和住院医师对记录的影响作为次要结果进行评估。
分析纳入了来自4个住院科室的779份患者病历。其中,563份(72.3%)被认为记录最少(至少有1项书面描述的干预措施),432份(55.5%)记录足够(患者住院期间至少有1份记录),81份(10.4%)记录广泛(与住院时间相关的记录数量合适)。药剂师在入院时进行的用药核对在696份(89.3%)患者记录中有所记录。临床科室有学生或住院医师与至少有1份随访记录的病历百分比显著增加相关(有学生/住院医师的为23.6%[120/508],无学生/住院医师的为12.5%[34/271];P<0.001)以及随访记录的平均数量(分别为0.59和0.23;P<0.001),但对其他变量没有影响。在药剂师撰写的总共777份记录中,与预先制定的标准的总体符合率为56.8%(441/777),入院、随访和出院记录的符合率分别为43.4%(139/320)、75.1%(272/362)和31.6%(30/95)。
临床药剂师在患者病历中的记录情况可以得到改善,以实现美国卫生系统药剂师协会和加拿大医院药剂师协会规定的目标,即所有重要的临床建议或干预措施都应记录在案。