Voeten Cesko C, Levelt Clara C
Leiden University Center for Linguistics, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jun 14;13:546. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00546. eCollection 2019.
Humans possess a robust speech-perception apparatus that is able to cope with variation in spoken language. However, linguists have often claimed that this coping ability must be limited, since otherwise there is no way for such variation to lead to language change and regional accents. Previous research has shown that the presence or absence of perceptual compensation is indexed by the N400 and P600 components, where the N400 reflects the general awareness of accented speech input, and the P600 responds to phonological-rule violations. The present exploratory paper investigates the hypothesis that these same components are involved in the accommodation to sound change, and that their amplitudes reduce as a sound change becomes accepted by an individual. This is investigated on the basis of a vowel shift in Dutch that has occurred in the Netherlands but not in Flanders (the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium). Netherlandic and Flemish participants were presented auditorily with words containing either conservative or novel vowel realizations, plus two control conditions. Exploratory analyses found no significant differences in ERPs to these realizations, but did uncover two systematic differences. Over 9 months, the N400 response became less negative for both groups of participants, but this effect was significantly smaller for the Flemish participants, a finding in line with earlier results on accent processing. Additionally, in one control condition where a "novel" realization was produced based on vowel lengthening, which cannot be achieved by any rule of either Netherlandic or Flemish Dutch and changes the vowel's phonemic identity, a P600 was obtained in the Netherlandic participants, but not in the Flemish participants. This P600 corroborates a small number of other studies which found phonological P600s, and provides ERP validation of earlier behavioral results that adaptation to variation in speech is possible, until the variation crosses a phoneme boundary. The results of this exploratory study thus reveal two types of perceptual-compensation (dys)function: on-line accent processing, visible as N400 amplitude, and failure to recover from an ungrammatical realization that crosses a phoneme boundary, visible as a P600. These results provide further insight on how these two ERPs reflect the processing of variation.
人类拥有一套强大的言语感知机制,能够应对口语中的变化。然而,语言学家们常常声称这种应对能力必定是有限的,因为否则这种变化就无法导致语言变化和地区口音的产生。先前的研究表明,感知补偿的存在与否可通过N400和P600成分来体现,其中N400反映了对口音语音输入的总体意识,而P600则对违反语音规则的情况做出反应。本探索性论文研究了这样一个假设,即这些相同的成分参与了对语音变化的适应,并且随着语音变化被个体接受,它们的波幅会减小。这一假设是基于荷兰语中的元音迁移来进行研究的,这种迁移发生在荷兰,但在佛兰德(比利时讲荷兰语的地区)并未出现。通过听觉向荷兰和佛兰德的参与者呈现包含保守或新颖元音发音的单词,以及两个控制条件。探索性分析发现,对这些发音的事件相关电位(ERP)没有显著差异,但确实发现了两个系统性差异。在9个月的时间里,两组参与者的N400反应的负性都有所降低,但佛兰德参与者的这种效应明显较小,这一发现与早期关于口音处理的结果一致。此外,在一个控制条件下,基于元音延长产生了一种“新颖”的发音,这在荷兰语或佛兰德荷兰语的任何规则中都无法实现,并且改变了元音的音位身份,荷兰参与者出现了P600,但佛兰德参与者没有。这个P600证实了其他一些发现语音P600的研究,并为早期行为学结果提供了ERP验证,即对语音变化的适应是可能的,直到这种变化跨越音位边界。因此,这项探索性研究的结果揭示了两种类型的感知补偿(功能)障碍:在线口音处理,表现为N400波幅;以及无法从跨越音位边界的不符合语法的发音中恢复,表现为P600。这些结果进一步深入了解了这两种ERP如何反映对变化的处理。