Suppr超能文献

四所本科健康专业院校的学习环境:经验教训

The learning environment of four undergraduate health professional schools: Lessons learned.

作者信息

Irfan Farhana, Faris Eiad Al, Maflehi Nasr Al, Karim Syed Irfan, Ponnamperuma Gominda, Saad Hussain, Ahmed Abdullah Ma

机构信息

Farhana Irfan, FRCGP., College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University Chair for Medical Education Research and Development, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Eiad Al Faris, MMed., College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University Chair for Medical Education Research and Development, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):598-604. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.3.712.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Learning is an interplay between cognition and environmental factors. Any learning environment, that fulfills the intrinsic and extrinsic needs of the students will probably lead to better and more promising learning outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the student perceptions of Learning Environment (LE) in four health schools of a large university and compare between schools, years of study, and gender.

METHODS

Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire and a socio-demographic questionnaire were completed by 1185 undergraduate students enrolled in the school of Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and Applied Medical Sciences (AMS) of a large university during the academic year 2012-2013. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Independent student t-test or ANOVA (with Tukey post-hoc test) was used for continuous variables at a significance level of p≤0.05.

RESULTS

The mean total DREEM score was 89.23±33.3. The total DREEM mean scores for Dentistry (120.54±23.45) and Medicine (110.72±19.33) were higher compared with AMS (63.48±21.36) and Nursing (57.48±22.80) (p=0.000) (Post hoc Tukey p=0.000). First year students gave significantly higher positive perceptions ratings than the rest of the years (p=0.000). Total scores were significantly higher for male (92.78±33.86) than female students (84.70±32.25) p=0.000.

CONCLUSION

The LE significantly differed by year and gender. The students from non-integrated curricula (nursing and AMS) perceived the LE less positively than their integrated curriculum counterparts (medicine and dentistry). A qualitative study is needed to investigate the variation in the perception of LE among these groups.

摘要

背景与目的

学习是认知与环境因素之间的相互作用。任何满足学生内在和外在需求的学习环境都可能带来更好、更有前景的学习成果。本研究旨在调查一所大型大学四所健康学院学生对学习环境(LE)的看法,并比较不同学院、学习年份和性别的差异。

方法

2012 - 2013学年,一所大型大学的医学、牙医学、护理学和应用医学科学学院(AMS)的1185名本科生完成了邓迪准备教育环境量表(DREEM)问卷和一份社会人口学问卷。采用卡方检验比较分类变量。连续变量采用独立样本t检验或方差分析(采用Tukey事后检验),显著性水平为p≤0.05。

结果

DREEM总平均分是89.23±33.3。牙医学(120.54±23.45)和医学(110.72±19.33)的DREEM总平均分高于AMS(63.48±21.36)和护理学(57.48±22.80)(p = 0.000)(事后Tukey检验p = 0.000)。一年级学生给出的积极看法评分显著高于其他年级(p = 0.000)。男生的总分(92.78±33.86)显著高于女生(84.70±32.25),p = 0.000。

结论

学习环境在年级和性别上存在显著差异。来自非整合课程(护理学和AMS)的学生对学习环境的看法不如整合课程(医学和牙医学)的学生积极。需要进行定性研究来调查这些群体对学习环境看法的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验