Suppr超能文献

人类后上颞沟从其他选择性面部区域中采样视觉空间的方式不同。

The Human Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Samples Visual Space Differently From Other Face-Selective Regions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO105DD, UK.

Section on Neurocircuitry, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 21;30(2):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz125.

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies show that ventral face-selective regions, including the fusiform face area (FFA) and occipital face area (OFA), preferentially respond to faces presented in the contralateral visual field (VF). In the current study we measured the VF response of the face-selective posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). Across 3 functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, participants viewed face videos presented in different parts of the VF. Consistent with prior results, we observed a contralateral VF bias in bilateral FFA, right OFA (rOFA), and bilateral human motion-selective area MT+. Intriguingly, this contralateral VF bias was absent in the bilateral pSTS. We then delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over right pSTS (rpSTS) and rOFA, while participants matched facial expressions in both hemifields. TMS delivered over the rpSTS disrupted performance in both hemifields, but TMS delivered over the rOFA disrupted performance in the contralateral hemifield only. These converging results demonstrate that the contralateral bias for faces observed in ventral face-selective areas is absent in the pSTS. This difference in VF response is consistent with face processing models proposing 2 functionally distinct pathways. It further suggests that these models should account for differences in interhemispheric connections between the face-selective areas across these 2 pathways.

摘要

神经影像学研究表明,腹侧面部选择性区域,包括梭状回面孔区(FFA)和枕部面孔区(OFA),优先对面孔在对侧视野(VF)中的呈现作出反应。在目前的研究中,我们测量了选择性的后颞上沟(pSTS)的VF 反应。在 3 个功能磁共振成像实验中,参与者观看了在 VF 的不同部位呈现的面孔视频。与先前的结果一致,我们观察到双侧 FFA、右侧 OFA(rOFA)和双侧人类运动选择性区域 MT+均存在对侧 VF 偏向。有趣的是,双侧 pSTS 中不存在这种对侧 VF 偏向。然后,我们在右 pSTS(rpSTS)和 rOFA 上施加经颅磁刺激(TMS),同时参与者在两个半视野中匹配面部表情。rpSTS 上的 TMS 干扰了两个半视野的表现,但 rOFA 上的 TMS 仅干扰了对侧半视野的表现。这些收敛的结果表明,在腹侧面部选择性区域中观察到的面孔的对侧偏向在 pSTS 中不存在。VF 反应的这种差异与提出 2 种功能上不同途径的面部处理模型一致。这进一步表明,这些模型应该考虑到这两种途径中选择性面部区域之间的大脑半球间连接的差异。

相似文献

10
FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.FFA 和 OFA 编码不同类型的面孔身份信息。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 3;41(9):1952-1969. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1449-20.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

4
An Eccentricity Gradient Reversal across High-Level Visual Cortex.跨高级视觉皮层的偏心率梯度反转。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 8;45(2):e0809242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-24.2024.

本文引用的文献

3
A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing.一种用于面部处理的修订神经框架。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 24;1:393-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518.
9
Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.人类梭状回的面孔特异性加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):605-10. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.605.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验