• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗精神病药的使用与危及生命的医疗事件风险:观察性研究的伞式综述。

Antipsychotic use and risk of life-threatening medical events: umbrella review of observational studies.

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Sep;140(3):227-243. doi: 10.1111/acps.13066. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1111/acps.13066
PMID:31264708
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of hip fracture, thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, pneumonia and sudden cardiac death associated with exposure to antipsychotics.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in Medline, Embase and PsycINFO from inception until 30/07/2018 for systematic reviews of observational studies. AMSTAR-2 was used for the quality assessment of systematic reviews, while the strength of associations was measured using GRADE and quantitative umbrella review criteria (URC).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight observational studies from six systematic reviews were included. The association between antipsychotic exposure and pneumonia was the strongest [URC = class I; GRADE = low quality; odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62-2.09; participants = 28 726; age = 76.2 ± 12.3 years], followed by the association with hip fracture (URC = class II; GRADE = low quality; OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.42-1.74; participants = 5 288 118; age = 55.4 ± 12.5 years), and thromboembolism (URC = class II; GRADE = very low quality; OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.31-1.83; participants = 31 417 175; age = 55.5 ± 3.2 years). The association was weak for stroke (URC = class III; GRADE = very low quality; OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.24-1.70; participants = 65 700; age = 68.7 ± 13.8 years), sudden cardiac death (URC = class III; GRADE = very low quality; OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.45-3.46; participants = 77 488; age = 52.2 ± 6.2 years) and myocardial infarction (URC = class III; GRADE = very low quality; OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.41-3.46; participants = 399 868; age = 74.1 ± 9.3 years).

CONCLUSION

The most robust results were found for the risk of pneumonia, followed by the risk of hip fracture and thromboembolism. For stroke, sudden cardiac death and myocardial infarction, the strength of association was weak. The observational nature of the primary studies may represent a source of bias.

摘要

目的

量化与抗精神病药物暴露相关的髋部骨折、血栓栓塞、中风、心肌梗死、肺炎和心源性猝死风险。

方法

从建立到 2018 年 7 月 30 日,系统地在 Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO 中搜索了观察性研究的系统评价。使用 AMSTAR-2 对系统评价进行质量评估,使用 GRADE 和定量伞式审查标准(URC)来衡量关联强度。

结果

纳入了来自 6 项系统评价的 68 项观察性研究。抗精神病药物暴露与肺炎的关联最强[URC=I 类;GRADE=低质量;比值比(OR)=1.84,95%置信区间(CI)=1.62-2.09;参与者=28726;年龄=76.2±12.3 岁],其次是与髋部骨折(URC=II 类;GRADE=低质量;OR=1.57,95%CI=1.42-1.74;参与者=5288118;年龄=55.4±12.5 岁)和血栓栓塞(URC=II 类;GRADE=极低质量;OR=1.55,95%CI=1.31-1.83;参与者=31417175;年龄=55.5±3.2 岁)的关联。与中风(URC=III 类;GRADE=极低质量;OR=1.45,95%CI=1.24-1.70;参与者=65000;年龄=68.7±13.8 岁)、心源性猝死(URC=III 类;GRADE=极低质量;OR=2.24,95%CI=1.45-3.46;参与者=77488;年龄=52.2±6.2 岁)和心肌梗死(URC=III 类;GRADE=极低质量;OR=2.21,95%CI=1.41-3.46;参与者=399868;年龄=74.1±9.3 岁)的关联则较弱。

结论

对于肺炎风险的研究结果最为可靠,其次是髋部骨折和血栓栓塞风险。对于中风、心源性猝死和心肌梗死,关联强度较弱。原始研究的观察性质可能是偏倚的一个来源。

相似文献

1
Antipsychotic use and risk of life-threatening medical events: umbrella review of observational studies.抗精神病药的使用与危及生命的医疗事件风险:观察性研究的伞式综述。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Sep;140(3):227-243. doi: 10.1111/acps.13066. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Quantifying the role of adverse events in the mortality difference between first and second-generation antipsychotics in older adults: systematic review and meta-synthesis.量化不良事件在老年人第一代和第二代抗精神病药物死亡率差异中的作用:系统评价与综合分析
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e105376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105376. eCollection 2014.
3
Risk of hospitalization for hip fracture and pneumonia associated with antipsychotic prescribing in the elderly: a self-controlled case-series analysis in an Australian health care claims database.老年人使用抗精神病药物与髋部骨折和肺炎住院风险的相关性:来自澳大利亚医疗索赔数据库的一项自我对照病例系列分析。
Drug Saf. 2011 Jul 1;34(7):567-75. doi: 10.2165/11588470-000000000-00000.
4
Choice of observational study design impacts on measurement of antipsychotic risks in the elderly: a systematic review.观察性研究设计的选择对老年人抗精神病药物风险测量的影响:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 8;12:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-72.
5
Antipsychotic drug use and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗精神病药物的使用与中风和心肌梗死风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2177-5.
6
Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.抗精神病药物暴露与骨折风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;33(4):181-196. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000221.
7
Sudden cardiac and sudden unexpected death related to antipsychotics: A meta-analysis of observational studies.抗精神病药物相关的心脏骤停和意外猝死:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;99(3):306-14. doi: 10.1002/cpt.250. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.抗精神病药物暴露与肺炎风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):812-20. doi: 10.1002/pds.3804. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
Psychoactive medicine use and the risk of hip fracture in older people: a case-crossover study.精神活性药物的使用与老年人髋部骨折风险:一项病例交叉研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jun;24(6):576-82. doi: 10.1002/pds.3785. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
Use of antipsychotics increases the risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗精神病药的使用增加了骨折风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1167-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3881-3. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Prescription Patterns of Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Patients-A Single-Center Prospective Study.精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物处方模式评估——一项单中心前瞻性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2941. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092941.
2
Letter to the FDA Proposing Major Changes in the US Clozapine Package Insert Supported by Clozapine Experts Worldwide. Part II: A Review of Fatal Outcomes in US Pharmacovigilance Data and Proposed Changes.致美国食品药品监督管理局的信:提议对美国氯氮平药品说明书进行重大修改,全球氯氮平专家提供支持。第二部分:对美国药物警戒数据中致命结果的回顾及提议的修改。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(3):197-218. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001990. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3
Clozapine and Pneumonia: Synthesizing the Link by Reviewing Existing Reports-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
氯氮平与肺炎:通过综述现有报告综合两者联系——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 6;60(12):2016. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122016.
4
The Brain-Heart Axis: An Umbrella Review on Impact of Psychiatric Disease on Incidence, Management, and Outlook of Cardiovascular Disease.脑-心轴:关于精神疾病对心血管疾病发病率、管理及预后影响的综合述评
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;14(8):919. doi: 10.3390/life14080919.
5
Placebo effects in randomized trials of pharmacological and neurostimulation interventions for mental disorders: An umbrella review.精神障碍药物和神经刺激干预随机试验中的安慰剂效应:一项伞状综述。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;29(12):3915-3925. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02638-x. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Group arts therapies for patients with schizophrenia: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.团体艺术治疗对精神分裂症患者的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e082076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082076.
7
Multiple adverse outcomes associated with antipsychotic use in people with dementia: population based matched cohort study.抗精神病药物在痴呆患者中的使用与多种不良结局相关:基于人群的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 17;385:e076268. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076268.
8
Psychiatry in the aftermath of COVID-19.新冠疫情后的精神病学。
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2020 Apr-Jun;13(2):105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Schizophrenic Patients Treated with Paliperidone Palmitate Once-Monthly Injection (PP1M): A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.棕榈酸帕利哌酮长效注射液(PP1M)治疗精神分裂症患者的心血管事件风险:台湾基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 May;44(5):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01358-y. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
Placebo effects in mental health disorders: protocol for an umbrella review.心理健康障碍中的安慰剂效应:伞式综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 30;13(11):e073946. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073946.