Simpson Daniel, Ehrensberger Monika, Horgan Frances, Blake Catherine, Roberts David, Broderick Patrick, Monaghan Kenneth
Clinical Health & Nutrition Centre (CHANCE), School of Science, Institute of Technology, Sligo, Ireland.
School of Physiotherapy, RCSI (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), Dublin, Ireland.
Physiother Res Int. 2019 Oct;24(4):e1792. doi: 10.1002/pri.1792. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
Independently, cross-education, the performance improvement of the untrained limb following unilateral training, and mirror therapy have shown to improve lower limb functioning poststroke. Mirror therapy has shown to augment the cross-education effect in healthy populations. However, this concept has not yet been explored in a clinical setting.
This study set out to investigate the feasibility and potential efficacy of applying cross-education combined with mirror therapy compared with cross-education alone for lower limb recovery poststroke.
Thirty-one chronic stroke participants (age 61.7 ± 13.3) completed either a unilateral strength training (ST; n = 15) or unilateral strength training with mirror-therapy (MST; n = 16) intervention. Both groups isometrically strength trained the less-affected ankle dorsiflexors three times per week for 4 weeks. Only the MST group observed the mirror reflection of the training limb. Patient eligibility, compliance, treatment reliability, and outcome measures were assessed for feasibility. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC; peak torque, rate of torque development, and average torque), 10-m walk test, timed up and go (TUG), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and the London Handicap Scale (LHS) were assessed at pretraining and posttraining.
Treatment and assessments were well tolerated without adverse effects. No between group differences were identified for improvement in MVC, MAS, TUG, or LHS. Only the combined treatment was associated with functional improvements with the MST group showing an increase in walking velocity.
Cross-education plus mirror therapy may have potential for improving motor function after stroke. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the combination treatment and the need for future studies with larger sample sizes to investigate the effectiveness of the treatment.
交叉教育(即单侧训练后未训练肢体的功能改善)和镜像疗法已分别被证明可改善中风后下肢功能。镜像疗法已被证明可增强健康人群的交叉教育效果。然而,这一概念尚未在临床环境中进行探索。
本研究旨在探讨与单独的交叉教育相比,交叉教育联合镜像疗法对中风后下肢恢复的可行性和潜在疗效。
31名慢性中风参与者(年龄61.7±13.3岁)完成了单侧力量训练(ST;n = 15)或单侧力量训练结合镜像疗法(MST;n = 16)干预。两组均每周对等长收缩较弱的踝关节背屈肌进行3次力量训练,共4周。只有MST组观察训练肢体的镜像反射。评估患者的入选资格、依从性、治疗可靠性和结果指标以确定可行性。在训练前和训练后评估最大自主收缩(MVC;峰值扭矩、扭矩发展速率和平均扭矩)、10米步行测试、计时起立行走测试(TUG)、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和伦敦残疾量表(LHS)。
治疗和评估耐受性良好,无不良反应。在MVC、MAS、TUG或LHS的改善方面,未发现组间差异。只有联合治疗与功能改善相关,MST组的步行速度有所增加。
交叉教育加镜像疗法可能对改善中风后的运动功能具有潜力。本研究证明了联合治疗的可行性以及未来需要进行更大样本量的研究来调查该治疗的有效性。