Ross J W, Pugh D
Center for Bioethics of Saint Joseph Health System, Orange, California.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1988 Jan;14(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30179-8.
The ethics of limited resuscitative efforts or partial code orders has been the subject of considerable disagreement. The customary objection to partial code orders is that they are ineffective in sustaining life and are intended to deceive the patient and/or patient's family into believing that resuscitation is possible when, in fact, the patient's death is imminent. This article suggests that the ethics and acceptability of partial code orders depend on their intent and that the motivation for partial code orders may differ substantially.
有限复苏努力或部分心肺复苏医嘱的伦理问题一直存在相当大的分歧。对部分心肺复苏医嘱的常见反对意见是,它们在维持生命方面无效,旨在欺骗患者和/或患者家属,使其相信复苏是可能的,而实际上患者已濒临死亡。本文认为,部分心肺复苏医嘱的伦理和可接受性取决于其意图,而且部分心肺复苏医嘱的动机可能有很大差异。