Suppr超能文献

与健康对照组相比,临床高危组的前脉冲抑制较低,但精神病家族风险组并非如此。

Lower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controls.

作者信息

Togay Bilge, Çıkrıkçılı Uğur, Bayraktaroglu Zubeyir, Uslu Atilla, Noyan Handan, Üçok Alp

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Psychiatry, Izmir, Turkey.

Artvin State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;14(2):196-202. doi: 10.1111/eip.12845. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Abstract

AIM

Although the lower level of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is well known in schizophrenia, the onset of this difference is not clear. The aim of the present study was to compare PPI in individuals with clinical and familial high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls.

METHODS

We studied PPI in individuals within three groups: ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR, n = 29), familial high risk for psychosis (FHR, n = 24) and healthy controls (HC, n = 28). The FHR group was chosen among siblings of patients with schizophrenia, whereas UHR was defined based on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). We collected clinical data using the BPRS-E, SANS and SAPS when individuals with UHR were antipsychotic-naïve. A cognitive battery that assessed attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal learning and memory domains was applied to all participants.

RESULTS

PPI was lower in the UHR group compared with both the FHR and HC groups. Those with a positive family history for schizophrenia had lower PPI than others in the UHR group. There was no difference in PPI between the FHR and HC groups. We found no relationship between PPI and cognitive performance in the three groups. Startle reactivity was not different among the three groups. Positive and negative symptoms were not related to PPI and startle reactivity in the UHR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that clinical and familial high-risk groups for psychosis have different patterns of PPI.

摘要

目的

尽管精神分裂症患者惊跳反应的预脉冲抑制(PPI)水平较低是众所周知的,但这种差异的起始情况尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较有精神病临床和家族高风险的个体与健康对照者的PPI。

方法

我们对三组个体的PPI进行了研究:精神病超高风险组(UHR,n = 29)、精神病家族高风险组(FHR,n = 24)和健康对照组(HC,n = 28)。FHR组是从精神分裂症患者的兄弟姐妹中选取的,而UHR组是根据《高危精神状态综合评估》(CAARMS)定义的。当UHR组个体未使用过抗精神病药物时,我们使用简明精神病评定量表扩展版(BPRS-E)、阴性症状评定量表(SANS)和阳性症状评定量表(SAPS)收集临床数据。对所有参与者应用了一个评估注意力、认知灵活性、工作记忆、言语学习和记忆领域的认知测试组合。

结果

与FHR组和HC组相比,UHR组的PPI较低。在UHR组中,有精神分裂症家族史阳性的个体的PPI低于其他个体。FHR组和HC组之间的PPI没有差异。我们发现三组中PPI与认知表现之间没有关系。三组之间的惊跳反应性没有差异。UHR组的阳性和阴性症状与PPI和惊跳反应性无关。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,精神病临床和家族高风险组具有不同的PPI模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验