Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta.
Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.
J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 28;221(8):1371-1378. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz316.
Since 2000, the reported prevalence of tick-borne spotted fever rickettsiosis has increased considerably. We compared the level of antibody reactivity among healthy blood donors from 2 widely separated regions of the United States and evaluated the impact of antibody prevalence on public health surveillance in one of these regions.
Donor serum samples were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay to identify immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies reactive with Rickettsia rickettsii. The Georgia Department of Public Health (GDPH) analyzed characteristics of cases from 2016 surveillance data to evaluate the utility of laboratory surveillance for case assessment.
Of the Georgia donors (n = 1493), 11.1% demonstrated antibody titers reactive with R. rickettsii at titers ≥64, whereas 6.3% of donors from Oregon and Washington (n = 1511) were seropositive. Most seropositive donors had a titer of 64; only 3.1% (n = 93) of all donors had titers ≥128. During 2016, GDPH interviewed 243 seropositive case patients; only 28% (n = 69) met inclusion criteria in the national case definition for spotted fever rickettsiosis.
These findings suggest that a single IgG antibody titer is an unreliable measure of diagnosis and could inaccurately affect surveillance estimates that define magnitude and clinical characteristics of Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever rickettsioses.
自 2000 年以来,蜱传斑点热立克次体病的报告发病率显著增加。我们比较了美国两个相距甚远的地区的健康献血者的抗体反应水平,并评估了其中一个地区的抗体流行率对公共卫生监测的影响。
通过间接免疫荧光抗体测定法评估供体血清样本,以鉴定与立氏立克次体反应的免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)抗体。佐治亚州公共卫生部(GDPH)分析了 2016 年监测数据中病例的特征,以评估实验室监测对病例评估的效用。
在佐治亚州的献血者(n = 1493)中,11.1%的人抗体滴度≥64 与 R. rickettsii 反应呈阳性,而来自俄勒冈州和华盛顿州的献血者(n = 1511)的 6.3%呈血清阳性。大多数血清阳性的献血者的滴度为 64;只有 3.1%(n = 93)的献血者的滴度≥128。在 2016 年,GDPH 采访了 243 名血清阳性病例患者;只有 28%(n = 69)符合国家斑点热立克次体病病例定义的纳入标准。
这些发现表明,单一 IgG 抗体滴度不是诊断的可靠指标,可能会不准确地影响监测估计,从而定义落矶山斑点热和其他斑点热立克次体病的严重程度和临床特征。