Suppr超能文献

两项加奈珠单抗治疗偏头痛的随机研究:对患者功能和残疾的影响。

Two randomized migraine studies of galcanezumab: Effects on patient functioning and disability.

机构信息

From Eli Lilly and Company (J.H.F., D.W.A., V.S., S.K.A., A.T.-H.), Indianapolis, IN; Sanofi (Q.Z.), Bridgewater, NJ; Elanco (J.N.C.), Greenfield, IN; Department of Neurology (E.L.), University of Calgary, Canada; and Department of Neurology (R.B.L.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Neurology. 2019 Jul 30;93(5):e508-e517. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007856. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes from baseline in patient-reported outcomes for measures of functioning and disability among patients with migraine treated with galcanezumab or placebo.

METHODS

Patients with episodic migraine (4-14 monthly migraine headache days) were treated with either galcanezumab (Evaluation of LY2951742 in the Prevention of Episodic Migraine [EVOLVE]-1: 120 mg n = 210, 240 mg n = 208; EVOLVE-2: 120 mg n = 226, 240 mg n = 220) or placebo (EVOLVE-1 n = 425; EVOLVE-2 n = 450) during 6 months of treatment. Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1 (MSQv2.1) measured the effect of migraine on patient functioning (physical and emotional) in 3 domains, and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) quantified headache-related disability associated with missed or reduced productivity at work or home and social events. Both were collected at baseline and during the treatment period (MSQv2.1 = monthly; MIDAS = months 3 and 6 only).

RESULTS

Differences in MSQv2.1 total score least squares (LS) mean change from baseline (month 4-6) for galcanezumab (120 and 240 mg, respectively) were superior to placebo (EVOLVE-1 = 7.3 and 6.7 [both < 0.001]; EVOLVE-2 = 8.5 and 7.3 [both < 0.001]). Differences were similar for all domain scores ( < 0.001 for both galcanezumab doses compared with placebo), were observed as early as month 1, and were sustained for 6 months for most domains. Differences of MIDAS LS mean change from baseline (month 6) for galcanezumab (120 and 240 mg, respectively) compared with placebo were: EVOLVE-1 = -6.3 ( < 0.001) and -5.2 ( = 0.002); EVOLVE-2 = -9.2 and -8.2 (both < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with episodic migraine treated with galcanezumab reported significant and clinically meaningful improvements in daily functioning and decreased disability compared with patients who received placebo.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with migraine, galcanezumab (120 mg or 240 mg) given once monthly improved functioning and reduced disability.

摘要

目的

评估偏头痛患者接受加奈珠单抗或安慰剂治疗后,功能和残疾测量的患者报告结局自基线的变化。

方法

患有阵发性偏头痛(每月偏头痛发作 4-14 天)的患者接受加奈珠单抗(预防阵发性偏头痛的评估[EVOLVE]-1:120mg n=210,240mg n=208;EVOLVE-2:120mg n=226,240mg n=220)或安慰剂(EVOLVE-1 n=425;EVOLVE-2 n=450)治疗 6 个月。偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷 v2.1(MSQv2.1)在 3 个领域测量偏头痛对患者功能(身体和情绪)的影响,偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)量化了与工作或家庭生产力下降或减少以及社交活动相关的头痛相关残疾。基线和治疗期间均收集 MSQv2.1(MSQv2.1=每月;MIDAS=仅第 3 和 6 个月)。

结果

加奈珠单抗(120 和 240mg)LS 均值变化与安慰剂相比,MSQv2.1 总分自基线(第 4-6 个月)的差异具有统计学意义(EVOLVE-1=7.3 和 6.7[均<0.001];EVOLVE-2=8.5 和 7.3[均<0.001])。所有领域评分的差异均具有统计学意义(加奈珠单抗的两种剂量与安慰剂相比,均<0.001),早在第 1 个月就观察到差异,并且在大多数领域,6 个月时持续存在。与安慰剂相比,基线(第 6 个月)MIDAS LS 均值变化的差异为:EVOLVE-1=-6.3(<0.001)和-5.2(=0.002);EVOLVE-2=-9.2 和-8.2(均<0.001)。

结论

与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受加奈珠单抗治疗的阵发性偏头痛患者在日常功能方面报告了显著且具有临床意义的改善,并降低了残疾程度。

证据分类

这项研究提供了 II 级证据,表明对于偏头痛患者,每月一次给予加奈珠单抗(120mg 或 240mg)可改善功能并减少残疾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d5/6693431/6d70f78d60f7/NEUROLOGY2018927822FF1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验