Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Communication, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Feb;29(2):135-141. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009268. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
Handoffs are often framed as the co-construction of a shared understanding relying on narrative storytelling. We investigated how narratives are constructed and used during resident and nurse handoff conversations.
We audio-recorded resident (n=149) and nurse (n=126) handoffs in an inpatient medicine unit. Qualitative analysis using grounded theory was conducted to identify and characterise the structure of resident and nursing handoff narratives.
Handoff conversations among both residents and nurses used three types of narratives: narratives on creating clinical imagery, narratives on coordinating care continuity and narratives on integrating contextual aspects of care. Clinical imagery narratives were common during patient introductions: residents used a top-down approach relying on overarching patient clinical situations (eg, 'a liver patient'), whereas nurses used a bottom-up approach using patient-specific identifying information. Narratives on the coordination of care continuity for residents focused on managing internal and external coordination activities, whereas nurse narratives focused on internal coordination, emphasising their role as an interface between patients and their physicians. Both resident and nurse narratives on the contextual aspects of care had considerable focus on highlighting 'heads up' anticipatory information and personal patient information; such information was often not present in patient charts, but was important for ensuring effective care management.
The presence of narrative structures highlights the need for new perspectives for the design of handoff tools that allow for both informational and cognitive support and shared awareness among conversational partners during handoff conversations. We discuss the implications of the use of narratives for patient safety and describe specific design considerations for supporting narrative interactions during handoffs.
交接班通常被认为是基于叙事故事的共同构建共享理解的过程。我们研究了叙述是如何在住院医师和护士交接班对话中构建和使用的。
我们在一个内科病房中录制了住院医师(n=149)和护士(n=126)的交接班。使用扎根理论进行定性分析,以识别和描述住院医师和护理交接班叙述的结构。
住院医师和护士的交接班对话使用了三种类型的叙述:创建临床意象的叙述、协调护理连续性的叙述和整合护理背景方面的叙述。在患者介绍期间,临床意象叙述很常见:住院医师使用自上而下的方法,依赖于患者总体临床情况(例如,“一个肝脏患者”),而护士则使用自下而上的方法,使用患者特定的识别信息。住院医师关于协调护理连续性的叙述侧重于管理内部和外部协调活动,而护士的叙述则侧重于内部协调,强调他们作为患者和医生之间的接口的作用。住院医师和护士关于护理背景方面的叙述都非常关注突出“提前了解”的预期信息和个人患者信息;这些信息通常不在患者图表中,但对于确保有效的护理管理很重要。
叙述结构的存在突出了需要从新的角度设计交接班工具,这些工具允许在交接班对话中为信息和认知支持以及对话伙伴之间的共享意识提供支持。我们讨论了叙述在患者安全方面的应用的意义,并描述了在交接班过程中支持叙述交互的具体设计考虑因素。