• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化跨学科过渡性护理对高需求、高费用患者的质量、结局和成本的影响:一项准实验研究。

Effect of Intensive Interdisciplinary Transitional Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients on Quality, Outcomes, and Costs: a Quasi-Experimental Study.

机构信息

Center for Health System Improvement, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1815-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05082-8. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-05082-8
PMID:31270786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many health systems have implemented team-based programs to improve transitions from hospital to home for high-need, high-cost patients. While preliminary outcomes are promising, there is limited evidence regarding the most effective strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of an intensive interdisciplinary transitional care program emphasizing medication adherence and rapid primary care follow-up for high-need, high-cost Medicaid and Medicare patients on quality, outcomes, and costs.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental study.

PATIENTS

Among 2235 high-need, high-cost Medicare and Medicaid patients identified during an index inpatient hospitalization in a non-profit health care system in a medically underserved area with complete administrative claims data, 285 participants were enrolled in the SafeMed care transition intervention, and 1950 served as concurrent controls.

INTERVENTIONS

The SafeMed team conducted hospital-based real-time screening, patient engagement, enrollment, enhanced discharge care coordination, and intensive home visits and telephone follow-up for at least 45 days.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary difference-in-differences analyses examined changes in quality (primary care visits, and medication adherence), outcomes (preventable emergency visits and hospitalizations, overall emergency visits, hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions, and hospital days), and medical expenditures.

KEY RESULTS

Adjusted difference-in-differences analyses demonstrated that SafeMed participation was associated with 7% fewer hospitalizations (- 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.73 to - 0.06), 31% fewer 30-day readmissions (- 0.34; 95% CI, - 0.61 to - 0.07), and reduced medical expenditures ($- 8690; 95% CI, $- 14,441 to $- 2939) over 6 months. Improvements were limited to Medicaid patients, who experienced large, statistically significant decreases of 39% in emergency department visits, 25% in hospitalizations, and 79% in 30-day readmissions. Medication adherence was unchanged (+ 2.6%; 95% CI, - 39.1% to 72.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Care transition models emphasizing strong interdisciplinary patient engagement and rapid primary care follow-up can enable health systems to improve quality and outcomes while reducing costs among high-need, high-cost Medicaid patients.

摘要

背景

许多医疗系统已经实施了基于团队的项目,以改善对高需求、高费用患者从医院到家庭的过渡。虽然初步结果很有希望,但关于最有效的策略的证据有限。

目的

确定强调药物依从性和快速初级保健随访的强化跨学科过渡护理计划对高质量、结果和成本对高需求、高费用医疗补助和医疗保险患者的影响。

设计

准实验研究。

患者

在一个医疗服务不足地区的非营利性医疗保健系统中,在一次住院期间,共有 2235 名高需求、高费用的医疗保险和医疗补助患者被确定为高需求、高费用患者,其中 285 名参与者参加了 SafeMed 护理过渡干预,1950 名作为同期对照。

干预措施

SafeMed 团队在医院进行实时筛查、患者参与、登记、增强出院护理协调以及至少 45 天的强化家访和电话随访。

主要措施

主要差异差异分析检查了质量(初级保健就诊和药物依从性)、结果(可预防的急诊就诊和住院、总体急诊就诊、住院、30 天再入院和住院天数)和医疗支出的变化。

主要结果

调整后的差异差异分析表明,SafeMed 参与与住院人数减少 7%(-0.40;95%置信区间(CI),-0.73 至 -0.06)、30 天再入院减少 31%(-0.34;95% CI,-0.61 至 -0.07)以及 6 个月内医疗支出减少 8690 美元(95% CI,-14441 至 -2939 美元)有关。改善仅限于医疗补助患者,他们的急诊就诊次数大幅减少 39%、住院次数减少 25%、30 天再入院次数减少 79%。药物依从性没有变化(+2.6%;95% CI,-39.1% 至 72.9%)。

结论

强调强化跨学科患者参与和快速初级保健随访的过渡护理模式可以使卫生系统在改善高需求、高费用医疗补助患者的质量和结果的同时降低成本。

相似文献

1
Effect of Intensive Interdisciplinary Transitional Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients on Quality, Outcomes, and Costs: a Quasi-Experimental Study.强化跨学科过渡性护理对高需求、高费用患者的质量、结局和成本的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1815-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05082-8. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
2
Association of a Care Coordination Model With Health Care Costs and Utilization: The Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnership (J-CHiP).以关怀协调模式对医疗成本和利用率的影响:约翰·霍普金斯社区卫生合作组织(J-CHiP)
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184273. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4273.
3
4
Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials.护理协调对医疗保险受益人的住院治疗、医疗质量和医疗保健支出的影响:15项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):603-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.126.
5
Reducing Preventable Hospitalizations With Two Models of Transitional Care.通过两种过渡性护理模式减少可预防的住院情况
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 May;48(3):322-9. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12210. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.医院参与质量报告项目与医疗保险受益人的手术结果及支出之间的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):496-504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.25.
7
Evaluation of specialized medication packaging combined with medication therapy management: adherence, outcomes, and costs among Medicaid patients.评估专科药物包装与药物治疗管理相结合:医疗补助计划患者的依从性、结果和成本。
Med Care. 2012 Jun;50(6):485-93. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182549d48.
8
The Alice Springs Hospital Readmission Prevention Project (ASHRAPP): a randomised control trial.爱丽丝泉医院再入院预防项目(ASHRAPP):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2077-7.
9
Association of Team-Based Primary Care With Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Chronically Ill Patients.基于团队的初级保健与慢性病患者的医疗利用和成本之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):54-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5118.
10
Evaluation of a Family Medicine Transitional Care Service Line.家庭医学过渡护理服务线的评估。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):619-627. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180272.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting high-need high-cost pediatric hospitalized patients in China based on machine learning methods.基于机器学习方法预测中国高需求高成本儿科住院患者。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99546-z.
2
A systematic review of outcomes reported in studies to optimise the medication use of patients at hospital discharge.一项关于优化出院患者药物使用的研究中所报告结果的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12024-6.
3
Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.综合护理干预能否加强初级保健并改善慢性病患者的治疗效果?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01260-1.
4
Sexual and Gender Diverse Healthcare Navigation Model: A Community-Participatory Delphi Adaptation of the Transitional Care Model for Sexual and Gender Diverse Individuals.性与性别多元化医疗导航模式:一种针对性与性别多元化个体的社区参与式德尔菲法对过渡性护理模式的适应性调整。
J Homosex. 2024 Nov 21:1-18. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2024.2431673.
5
Transitional Care Program in Reducing Acute Hospital Utilization in Singapore.新加坡减少急性医院使用的过渡性护理计划。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 28;12(21):2144. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212144.
6
Disentangling organizational levers and economic benefits in transitional care programs: a systematic review and configurational analysis.解析过渡护理计划中的组织杠杆和经济效益:系统评价和组态分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10461-3.
7
Evaluating Person-Centred Integrated Care to People with Complex Chronic Conditions: Early Implementation Results of the ProPCC Programme.评估针对复杂慢性病患者的以患者为中心的综合护理:ProPCC项目的早期实施结果
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Dec 13;23(4):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7585. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Effectiveness of Transitional Care Program among High-Risk Discharged Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study on Saving Costs, Post-Discharge Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits.高危出院患者过渡护理计划的效果:节约成本、出院后再入院和急诊就诊的准实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 2;20(23):7136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237136.
9
Impact of an Area Agency on Aging pharmacist-led Community Care Transition Initiative.老龄化地区代理机构药剂师主导的社区护理过渡计划的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Jul-Aug;63(4):1230-1236.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Association between service scope of primary care facilities and prevalence of high-cost population: a retrospective study in rural Guizhou, China.基层医疗服务机构服务范围与高费用人群患病率的关联:中国贵州农村的回顾性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 25;23(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01914-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Engagement in ACO Practices and Patient-reported Outcomes Among Adults With Co-occurring Chronic Disease and Mental Health Conditions.患者参与 ACO 实践与共病慢性疾病和精神健康状况成人患者报告结局
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):551-556. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000927.
2
The impact of tailored intervention services on charges and mortality for adult super-utilizers.定制干预服务对成人超高利用者费用和死亡率的影响。
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Dec;6(4):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
3
Unmet Primary Care Needs in Diabetic Patients with Multimorbidity in a Medically Underserved Area.医疗服务匮乏地区合并多种疾病的糖尿病患者未满足的初级医疗需求
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 May 11;4:2333392817702760. doi: 10.1177/2333392817702760. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
4
For Super-Utilizers, Integrated Care Offers A New Path.对于超级使用者来说,综合护理提供了一条新途径。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):394-397. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0112.
5
Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts.将高成本 Medicare 患者细分到潜在可操作队列中。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
Drug therapy problems and medication discrepancies during care transitions in super-utilizers.频繁就医者在医疗转换期间的药物治疗问题和用药差异。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Nov-Dec;56(6):633-642.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
High-Need, High-Cost Patients: Who Are They and How Do They Use Health Care? A Population-Based Comparison of Demographics, Health Care Use, and Expenditures.高需求、高成本患者:他们是谁以及如何使用医疗服务?基于人群的人口统计学、医疗服务使用情况和支出比较。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Aug;26:1-14.
8
The Effectiveness of Emergency Department Visit Reduction Programs: A Systematic Review.减少急诊科就诊项目的有效性:一项系统评价
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):467-483.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
SafeMed: Using pharmacy technicians in a novel role as community health workers to improve transitions of care.安全医疗:利用药剂师技术员担任社区卫生工作者这一新角色来改善医疗转诊。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Jan;56(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2015.11.011.
10
Characteristics of Hospital and Emergency Care Super-utilizers with Multiple Chronic Conditions.患有多种慢性病的医院和急诊护理过度使用者的特征。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):e203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 21.