Schupbach Peter, Glauser Roland, Bauer Sebastian
Schupbach Ltd, Laboratory for Histology, Electron Microscopy and Imaging, CH-8800 Thalwil, Switzerland.
Cosmodent Clinic, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Biomater. 2019 Jun 2;2019:6318429. doi: 10.1155/2019/6318429. eCollection 2019.
Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse different commercially available implant systems with a SA-modified surface and to explore the widespread notion that they have similar surface properties regarding morphology and cleanliness. SA-modified surfaces of nine implant systems manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec Ltd, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Dentsply Sirona Dental GmbH, Neoss Ltd, Osstem Implant Co. Ltd, Institute Straumann AG, and Thommen Medical AG were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and examined for surface cleanliness. Six implants from three different lots were selected per each implant system. Mean particle counts for each implant and the mean size of the particles were calculated from three different regions of interest and compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis showed presence of particles on the majority of analyzed implant surfaces, and EDX evaluations determined that the particles were made of AlO and thus remnants of the blasting process. SPI®ELEMENT INICELL® and Bone Level (BL) Roxolid® SLActive® implant surfaces showed the highest mean particle counts, 46.6 and 50.3 per area, respectively. The surface of BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant also showed the highest variations in the particle counts, even in samples from the same lot. The mean size of particles was 1120±1011 m, measured for USIII CA Fixture implants, while the biggest particle was 5900 m found on a BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant. These results suggest that not all manufacturers are able to produce implant surfaces without particle contamination and highlight that the surface modification process with the SA technique should be appropriately designed and controlled to achieve a clean and consistent final medical device.
与经过机械加工的表面相比,具有适度粗糙表面的牙种植体显示出更强的骨结合能力和更快的骨愈合速度。喷砂和酸蚀(SA)工艺是一种用于制造具有适度粗糙表面的牙种植体的技术。本研究的目的是分析不同的具有SA改性表面的市售种植体系统,并探讨一种普遍的观点,即它们在形态和清洁度方面具有相似的表面特性。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散X射线光谱(EDX)对由Alpha-Bio Tec有限公司、Camlog生物技术股份公司、登士柏西诺德牙科有限公司、Neoss有限公司、奥齿泰种植体有限公司、士卓曼集团和托曼医疗股份公司制造的九种植体系统的SA改性表面进行了分析,并检查了表面清洁度。每个种植体系统从三个不同批次中选择六个种植体。从三个不同的感兴趣区域计算每个种植体的平均颗粒计数和颗粒的平均大小,并使用方差分析和Tukey检验进行比较。SEM分析显示,在大多数分析的种植体表面存在颗粒,EDX评估确定这些颗粒由AlO组成,因此是喷砂过程的残留物。SPI®ELEMENT INICELL®和骨水平(BL)Roxolid® SLActive®种植体表面的平均颗粒计数最高,分别为每单位面积46.6和50.3个。BL Roxolid® SLActive®种植体的表面在颗粒计数方面也显示出最大的差异,即使是来自同一批次的样品。USIII CA Fixture种植体的颗粒平均大小为1120±1011μm,而在BL Roxolid® SLActive®种植体上发现的最大颗粒为5900μm。这些结果表明,并非所有制造商都能够生产无颗粒污染的种植体表面,并强调应适当设计和控制SA技术的表面改性过程,以获得清洁且一致的最终医疗器械。