Suppr超能文献

八种市售牙科植入物的化学和形貌分析

Chemical and Topographic Analysis of Eight commercially Available Dental Implants.

作者信息

Peck Mogammad T, Chrcanovic Bruno R

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, e-mail:

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, MalmS University, MalmS, Sweden.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):354-60. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1855.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surface characterization of dental implants allows us to better understand the effects of the implant on the host biological response. In this study, we analyzed and compared these characteristics among implants commercially available in South Africa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight implants from different manufacturers were chosen for analysis (Touareg, ICE, (R)Evolutions, Uniti, AnyRidge, MIS, Ivory-QSI, Southern), using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), interferometry, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to study the surface chemical composition and morphology.

RESULTS

The results indicate that variations in manufacturer processes result in implant surfaces that are distinctly different from one another. Most implants presented a moderately rough surface with sandblasted-only implant surfaces having a lower mean value of Sa when compared with sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces. Carbon contamination was detected on all the implants and that of aluminum on five implant surfaces. Ca and P were detected on the surface of Touareg implants, indicating the manufacturer's attempt to enhance osseointegration.

CONCLUSION

The surface of the implants showed a range of chemical, physical properties, and surface topographies.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The results indicate that implant surface treatment is not standardized. This may have clinical implications. Further clinical research is required.

摘要

背景

牙种植体的表面特性有助于我们更好地理解种植体对宿主生物学反应的影响。在本研究中,我们分析并比较了南非市场上可获得的不同种植体的这些特性。

材料与方法

选择了来自不同制造商的8种种植体(图阿雷格、ICE、(R)Evolutions、Uniti、AnyRidge、MIS、象牙-QSI、Southern)进行分析,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、干涉测量法和能量色散X射线光谱法研究表面化学成分和形态。

结果

结果表明,制造商工艺的差异导致种植体表面明显不同。大多数种植体呈现中等粗糙度的表面,与经过喷砂和酸蚀处理的表面相比,仅经过喷砂处理的种植体表面的Sa平均值较低。在所有种植体上均检测到碳污染,在五个种植体表面检测到铝污染。在图阿雷格种植体表面检测到钙和磷,表明制造商试图增强骨整合。

结论

种植体表面呈现出一系列化学、物理性质和表面形貌。

临床意义

结果表明种植体表面处理未标准化。这可能具有临床意义。需要进一步的临床研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验