Suppr超能文献

特质优势与社会应激时的心血管功能。

Trait dominance and cardiovascular functioning during social stress.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Stress Health. 2019 Oct;35(4):516-524. doi: 10.1002/smi.2884. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Abstract

Cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) to stress has been found to be an important indicator of future ill health, and individual differences in personality have been posited to explain disparities in outcomes. Dominance is associated with forceful persons who desire hierarchy in social interactions. This study investigated dominance and CVR during social or asocial stressors. Sixty-one women, categorized as low, moderate, or high in dominance using the Jackson Personality Research Form, completed a social or asocial stressor while undergoing cardiovascular measurement during baseline, stressor, and recovery phases. A 3 × 2 × 3 analysis of covariance revealed a significant Phase × Stressor × Dominance interaction for systolic blood pressure (SBP). Women with lower and moderate dominance-but not women with higher dominance-exhibited greater SBP responses to stress in the social condition compared with the asocial condition. No significant difference was found for women with higher dominance, indicative of blunted SBP during the social stressor. During recovery, women with lower dominance had marginally elevated SBP in the social condition compared with the asocial condition. The current study extends prior knowledge of the association between dominance and CVR, such that greater dominance was associated with blunted SBP and lower dominance was associated with attenuated recovery to social stress.

摘要

心血管反应性(CVR)对压力的反应被认为是未来健康不良的一个重要指标,而个性的个体差异被认为可以解释结果的差异。支配性与渴望在社交互动中建立等级制度的强势人士有关。本研究调查了在社交或非社交应激源下的支配性和 CVR。61 名女性使用杰克逊人格研究表(Jackson Personality Research Form)被分为低、中或高支配性,在基线、应激源和恢复阶段进行心血管测量的同时完成了社交或非社交应激源。三因素两因素重复测量方差分析显示,收缩压(SBP)的相位×应激源×支配性交互作用显著。与非社交条件相比,低支配性和中支配性的女性在社交条件下的 SBP 反应更大,但高支配性的女性则没有。对于高支配性的女性,没有发现显著差异,表明在社交应激源下 SBP 减弱。在恢复期间,与非社交条件相比,低支配性的女性在社交条件下的 SBP 略有升高。本研究扩展了先前关于支配性与 CVR 之间关联的知识,即较高的支配性与 SBP 减弱有关,而较低的支配性与社交应激恢复减弱有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验