Suppr超能文献

骨科手术中的外层手套:聚酯/不锈钢丝编织手套内衬与乳胶手套的比较

Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex.

作者信息

Louis S S, Steinberg E L, Gruen O A, Bartlett C S, Helfet D L

机构信息

Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Good Samaritan Hospital, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Feb;12(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of traditional double latex gloving with that of a highly cut-resistant polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove (PSSWWG) over a single latex inner glove for the prevention of perforation of the inner latex glove.

DESIGN

The primary surgeon and first assistant were involved in a prospective randomized study. Group I consisted of twenty-five procedures in which double latex gloves were used. Group II consisted of twenty-five procedures in which a PSSWWG liner was worn over an inner latex glove. All inner gloves were tested for perforations; all gloves exchanged that were presumed to have a perforation were noted and also tested. The type and length of the procedure were recorded. The dominant hand was recorded for all participants, along with their comments on the PSSWWG liner's performance.

SETTING

Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery. New York.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Major operative cases, November 1996 to February 1997.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Inner latex glove perforations.

RESULTS

With the use of PSSWWG liners, the percentage of inner gloves found with a perforation dropped from 19 percent in the double latex group to 15 percent in the PSSWWG liner group (not statistically significant, p = 0.4). Two thirds of the perforations were in the primary surgeon's gloves, located in either the index finger or thumb. Nearly 80 percent of all perforations went unrecognized in both groups. Ninety-five percent of all perforations were in gloves that had been in use for more than 120 minutes (statistically significant, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The particular cut-resistant glove studied (Sceptor) did not significantly reduce the rate of inner glove perforations. Other studies with different cut-resistant glove types and protocols have proven the liners effective. We would still recommend using outer cloth or cut-resistant type gloves when bone fragments are being manipulated or when using sharp implants or saws. At a minimum, surgical gloves should be changed every two hours.

摘要

目的

比较传统双层乳胶手套与一种高抗切割聚酯/不锈钢丝编织手套(PSSWWG)搭配单层乳胶内手套在预防内乳胶手套穿孔方面的效果。

设计

主刀医生和第一助手参与一项前瞻性随机研究。第一组包括25例使用双层乳胶手套的手术。第二组包括25例在内层乳胶手套外佩戴PSSWWG内衬的手术。所有内手套均进行穿孔测试;所有被认为有穿孔而更换的手套都被记录并进行测试。记录手术类型和时长。记录所有参与者的优势手,以及他们对PSSWWG内衬性能的评价。

地点

纽约特种外科医院骨科创伤科。

患者/参与者:1996年11月至1997年2月的重大手术病例。

主要观察指标

内乳胶手套穿孔情况。

结果

使用PSSWWG内衬时,发现有穿孔的内手套百分比从双层乳胶组的19%降至PSSWWG内衬组的15%(无统计学意义,p = 0.4)。三分之二的穿孔发生在主刀医生的手套上,位于食指或拇指。两组中近80%的穿孔均未被发现。所有穿孔中有95%发生在使用超过120分钟的手套上(有统计学意义,p = 0.01)。

结论

所研究的这种特殊抗切割手套(Sceptor)并未显著降低内手套穿孔率。其他关于不同类型抗切割手套及方案的研究已证明内衬是有效的。当处理骨碎片或使用锋利植入物或锯子时,我们仍建议使用外层布质或抗切割型手套。至少,手术手套应每两小时更换一次。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验