Kaae Susanne, Nørgaard Lotte Stig, Sporrong Sofia Kälvemark, Almarsdottir Anna Birna, Kofoed Mette, Daysh Rami Faris, Jowkar Nima
Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Denmark, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jul 4;7(3):84. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030084.
: Studies suggest that the way pharmacy counselling takes place does not fully support patients in obtaining optimal medicine use. To understand the basis of current challenges in pharmacy counselling, we investigated which selected related cues, i.e., objects, sounds, or circumstances in prescription encounters, patients, and pharmacy staff notice, and how they interpret these cues. Pharmacy practice researchers' cue orientation was also investigated to explore possible differences to those of staff and patients. : Twelve focus group interviews representing 5 community pharmacies (staff and patients) and 2 universities (researchers) were conducted during 2017-2018 in Denmark. A total of 20 patients, 22 pharmacy staff, and 6 pharmacy researchers participated. A theoretical analysis based on cue orientation and social appraisal was conducted. Pharmacy staff, patients and researchers noticed different selected related cues in prescription encounters. Staff particularly noticed 'types of patients'. Patients were more divided and grouped into three overall categories: 'types of staff', medical content, and the situation around the encounter. Pharmacy researchers noticed multiple cues. Different emotions were integrated in the construction of the cues. Differences in the cue orientation between all three groups were identified. The identified types of cues and emotions can explain an underlying dissatisfaction with the encounters. Patients lack, in particular, more personal contact. Staff need to consider these aspects to provide relevant counselling.
研究表明,药学咨询的开展方式未能充分支持患者实现最佳用药。为了解当前药学咨询面临挑战的根源,我们调查了在处方问诊过程中患者和药房工作人员所注意到的特定相关线索,即物品、声音或情况,以及他们如何解读这些线索。我们还调查了药学实践研究人员的线索导向,以探索其与工作人员和患者的线索导向可能存在的差异。2017年至2018年期间,在丹麦对代表5家社区药房(工作人员和患者)以及2所大学(研究人员)的12个焦点小组进行了访谈。共有20名患者、22名药房工作人员和6名药学研究人员参与。基于线索导向和社会评估进行了理论分析。药房工作人员、患者和研究人员在处方问诊过程中注意到不同的特定相关线索。工作人员特别注意到“患者类型”。患者的关注点更为分散,总体上分为三类:“工作人员类型”、医学内容以及问诊时的情况。药学研究人员注意到多个线索。不同的情感融入到了线索的构建中。确定了所有三组在线索导向上的差异。所确定的线索类型和情感可以解释对问诊存在潜在不满的原因。特别是患者缺乏更多的人际接触。工作人员需要考虑这些方面以提供相关的咨询服务。