Suppr超能文献

替代途径的模式:2012-2016 年斯洛伐克特殊药物报销制度的剖析。

Patterns of alternative access: Unpacking the Slovak extraordinary drug reimbursement regime 2012-2016.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Doctoral School of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pécs, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2019 Aug;123(8):713-720. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

Abstract

Many countries employ "alternative access schemes" (e.g. compassionate use, early access programs, off-label use) that seek to provide patients with access to drugs not included on a positive drug list. These schemes offer flexibility to policy-makers but often lack transparency and clear rules. This ambiguity allows for dynamic responses to weaknesses in the main drug approval and reimbursement systems, but also opportunistic use by the health professionals, industry or patients. Yet, most descriptions of these schemes focus on the de jure rather than the de facto situation, presenting a potentially misleading picture. We describe one such scheme in practice: the Slovak "extraordinary reimbursement regime" (ERR), using semi-structured interviews with 18 experts and a new dataset of ERR drugs. The ERR expanded rapidly, doubling between 2012 and 2016. It combined features of four reimbursement schemes: (1) a backdoor market access for expensive drugs; (2) a compassionate use scheme for investigational drugs combined with a "legacy drugs" scheme for older unlicensed drugs; (3) a disease-specific scheme for cancer and orphan drugs; and (4) a scheme for off-label and "off-indication" drugs. These four features reflect broader challenges facing the Slovak reimbursement system. We conclude that detailed study of the type, size and evolution over time of alternative access schemes can serve as indicators of health policy objectives neglected by standard reimbursement systems.

摘要

许多国家采用“替代准入方案”(例如同情用药、早期准入计划、超适应证用药),旨在为患者提供获得未列入正面药物清单的药物的途径。这些方案为政策制定者提供了灵活性,但往往缺乏透明度和明确的规则。这种模糊性允许对主要药物审批和报销系统的弱点做出灵活反应,但也为卫生专业人员、行业或患者提供了机会主义利用的空间。然而,大多数对这些方案的描述都侧重于法律上的情况,而不是事实上的情况,这可能会造成误导。我们描述了一种这样的方案:斯洛伐克的“特殊报销制度”(ERR),采用与 18 名专家的半结构化访谈和 ERR 药物的新数据集。ERR 迅速扩大,在 2012 年至 2016 年间翻了一番。它结合了四种报销方案的特点:(1)为昂贵药物开辟后门准入市场;(2)将研究性药物的同情用药方案与针对旧未许可药物的“遗留药物”方案相结合;(3)针对癌症和孤儿药物的特定疾病方案;(4)用于超适应证和“超适应证”药物的方案。这四个特点反映了斯洛伐克报销系统面临的更广泛挑战。我们的结论是,对替代准入方案的类型、规模和随时间演变的详细研究可以作为被标准报销系统忽视的卫生政策目标的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验