Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6477-6488. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
To perform head-to-head comparisons of the feasibility and diagnostic performance of transient elastography (TE), point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).
This prospective, cross-sectional, dual-center imaging study included 100 patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease caused by hepatitis B or C virus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or autoimmune hepatitis identified between 2014 and 2018. Liver stiffness measured with the three elastographic techniques was obtained within 6 weeks of a liver biopsy. Confounding effects of inflammation and steatosis on association between fibrosis and liver stiffness were assessed. Obuchowski scores and AUCs for staging fibrosis were evaluated and the latter were compared using the DeLong method.
TE, pSWE, and MRE were technically feasible and reliable in 92%, 79%, and 91% subjects, respectively. At univariate analysis, liver stiffness measured by all techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. For classification of dichotomized fibrosis stages, the AUCs were significantly higher for distinguishing stages F0 vs. ≥ F1 with MRE than with TE (0.88 vs. 0.71; p < 0.05) or pSWE (0.88 vs. 0.73; p < 0.05), and for distinguishing stages ≤ F1 vs. ≥ F2 with MRE than with TE (0.85 vs. 0.75; p < 0.05). TE, pSWE, and MRE Obuchowski scores for staging fibrosis stages were respectively 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96).
MRE provided a higher diagnostic performance than TE and pSWE for staging early stages of liver fibrosis.
NCT02044523 KEY POINTS: • The technical failure rate was similar between MRE and US-based elastography techniques. • Liver stiffness measured by MRE and US-based elastography techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. • MRE provided a diagnostic accuracy higher than US-based elastography techniques for staging of early stages of histology-determined liver fibrosis.
对头对头比较瞬时弹性成像(TE)、点剪切波弹性成像(pSWE)和磁共振弹性成像(MRE)的可行性和诊断性能。
本前瞻性、横断面、双中心成像研究纳入了 2014 年至 2018 年间确诊或疑似由乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎病毒、非酒精性脂肪性肝病或自身免疫性肝炎引起的慢性肝病的 100 例患者。在肝活检后 6 周内获得三种弹性成像技术测量的肝硬度。评估炎症和脂肪变性对纤维化与肝硬度之间关联的混杂影响。评估纤维化分期的 Obuchowski 评分和 AUC,并使用 DeLong 方法比较后者。
TE、pSWE 和 MRE 在 92%、79%和 91%的受试者中分别具有技术可行性和可靠性。在单因素分析中,所有技术测量的肝硬度均随纤维化分期、炎症和脂肪变性的增加而增加。对于纤维化分期的二分法分类,MRE 区分 F0 与≥F1 的 AUC 显著高于 TE(0.88 比 0.71;p<0.05)或 pSWE(0.88 比 0.73;p<0.05),MRE 区分≤F1 与≥F2 的 AUC 也显著高于 TE(0.85 比 0.75;p<0.05)。TE、pSWE 和 MRE 用于纤维化分期的 Obuchowski 评分分别为 0.89(95%CI 0.85-0.93)、0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.94)和 0.94(95%CI 0.91-0.96)。
MRE 提供了比 TE 和 pSWE 更高的诊断性能,用于分期早期肝纤维化。
NCT02044523
MRE 与基于 US 的弹性成像技术的技术失败率相似。
MRE 和基于 US 的弹性成像技术测量的肝硬度随纤维化分期、炎症和脂肪变性的增加而增加,随脂肪变性的减少而减少。
MRE 提供的诊断准确性高于基于 US 的弹性成像技术,用于分期组织学确定的早期肝纤维化。