Department of Animal Science and Technology and BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do, 17546, Republic of Korea.
Department of Animal Science and Technology and BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do, 17546, Republic of Korea.
Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 15;138:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.043. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
In recent years, genomic and proteomic biomarkers have been identified for the diagnosis of male fertility to overcome the limitations of conventional semen analysis. Owing to the limited genes available so far, the single gene approach is commonly adopted for analyzing the phenotype of interest. However, the single-gene approach is less effective than multiple-gene strategies for diagnosing a desirable phenotype. Herein, we investigate the ability of two fertility-related genomic markers (porcine seminal protein (PSP)-I and PSP-II) in spermatozoa to predict boar litter size in addition to conventional semen parameters. First, we examined different semen parameters (motility, motion kinematics, and capacitation status) and gene expression in high- and low-litter size boar spermatozoa. Then, we evaluated the correlation of these parameters with the fertility of 21 Yorkshire boars. Finally, we investigated the efficacy of single/combined markers to predict male fertility using a comprehensive statistical model. Our result showed that there were no significant differences in sperm motility, motion kinematics, or capacitation status, however, the mRNA expression of PSP-I and PSP-II in spermatozoa was significantly different in high- and low-litter size boars. In the individual screening test, the expression of both genes was negatively correlated with boar fertility (r = 0-0.578 and -0.456, respectively), whereas only hyperactivation (HYP) showed a positive correlation (r = 0.444) among the tested semen parameters. As single markers, PSP-I and PSP-II have a better diagnostic power to predict boar fertility, regardless of HYP, in quality assessment analyses. In addition, when these markers were combined, the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall test effectiveness for fertility detection were improved. Surprisingly, when PSP-I and PSP-II were considered together, the deviation of the predicted average litter size between high- and low-litter size boars was 1.77. Based on the findings, we suggest that the use of genomic markers in spermatozoa rather than commonly analyzed semen parameters may be more accurate for evaluating male fertility. Moreover, using a combination of markers could increase the overall accuracy of (in)fertility predictions, and thus, could be considered for field application.
近年来,为了克服传统精液分析的局限性,已经确定了用于男性生育力诊断的基因组和蛋白质组生物标志物。由于到目前为止可用的基因有限,因此通常采用单基因方法来分析感兴趣的表型。然而,与多基因策略相比,单基因方法在诊断理想表型方面的效果较差。在此,我们研究了两个与生育力相关的基因组标记(猪精液蛋白(PSP)-I 和 PSP-II)在精子中的能力,以预测除了常规精液参数以外的公猪产仔数。首先,我们检查了高产仔数和低产仔数公猪精子中不同的精液参数(活力、运动运动学和获能状态)和基因表达。然后,我们评估了这些参数与 21 头约克夏公猪的生育力的相关性。最后,我们使用综合统计模型研究了单个/组合标记预测雄性生育力的功效。我们的结果表明,精子活力、运动运动学或获能状态没有明显差异,但是,高产仔数和低产仔数公猪精子中 PSP-I 和 PSP-II 的 mRNA 表达存在显著差异。在个体筛选测试中,这两个基因的表达与公猪的生育力呈负相关(r=0-0.578 和-0.456),而在测试的精液参数中仅超激活(HYP)呈正相关(r=0.444)。作为单个标记,无论 HYP 如何,PSP-I 和 PSP-II 在质量评估分析中对预测公猪的生育力均具有更好的诊断能力。此外,当这些标记组合使用时,生育力检测的阳性预测值、阴性预测值和总测试有效性得到提高。令人惊讶的是,当同时考虑 PSP-I 和 PSP-II 时,高产仔数和低产仔数公猪之间预测平均产仔数的偏差为 1.77。基于这些发现,我们建议在评估雄性生育力时,使用精子中的基因组标记而不是通常分析的精液参数可能更准确。此外,使用标记的组合可以提高(不孕)生育力预测的整体准确性,因此可以考虑在现场应用。