Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
West China School of Clinical Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e860-e870. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 21.
The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy by using the transperineal (TP) versus transrectal (TR) route in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) remains to be revealed. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2019 was conducted. We pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for csPCa detected by TP and TR MRI-targeted biopsy. The relative sensitivity (or risk ratio) between TP and TR route was synthesized. We also pooled the diagnostic sensitivity of either approach using the combined biopsy results as the reference standard. A total of 328 patients with positive multiparametric MRI underwent TP MRI-targeted biopsy, and 315 patients underwent TR MRI-targeted biopsy. The TP route detected more csPCa, with a detection rate of 62.2% (204/328) compared to 41.3% (130/315) for the TR route (odds ratio = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.71-3.26). After adjusting for differences in cancer prevalence, TP MRI-targeted biopsy detected 91.3% (105/115) of csPCa compared to 72.2% (83/115) by the TR route (risk ratio = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity of the TP route (86%; 95% CI, 77-96) was better than the TR route (73%, 62-88%). The TR approach missed more csPCa located at the anterior zone of the prostate (20 vs. 3). The TP route performed better than the TR route in MRI-targeted biopsy, especially in detecting csPCa located at the anterior prostate. More large prospective randomized or head-to-head comparison studies comparing the two approaches are warranted.
经会阴(TP)与经直肠(TR)途径磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检诊断临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的准确性仍有待揭示。系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Ovid 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间截至 2019 年 4 月。我们汇总了 TP 和 TR MRI 靶向活检检测 csPCa 的优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。综合两种途径的相对敏感性(或风险比)。我们还汇总了这两种方法的诊断敏感性,以联合活检结果作为参考标准。共 328 例多参数 MRI 阳性患者行 TP MRI 靶向活检,315 例患者行 TR MRI 靶向活检。TP 途径检测到更多的 csPCa,检出率为 62.2%(204/328),而 TR 途径为 41.3%(130/315)(OR=2.37;95%CI,1.71-3.26)。调整癌症患病率差异后,TP MRI 靶向活检检测到 91.3%(105/115)的 csPCa,而 TR 途径为 72.2%(83/115)(风险比=1.26;95%CI,1.02-1.54)。TP 途径的汇总诊断敏感性为 86%(95%CI,77-96),优于 TR 途径(73%,62-88%)。TP 途径比 TR 途径更能发现位于前列腺前区的 csPCa(20 例 vs. 3 例)。在 MRI 靶向活检中,TP 途径优于 TR 途径,尤其是在检测位于前列腺前区的 csPCa 方面。需要更多的前瞻性随机或头对头比较研究来比较这两种方法。