Suppr超能文献

心理健康专业人员对强迫性性行为的病理化:客户的性别和性取向是否重要?

Mental health professionals' pathologization of compulsive sexual behavior: Does clients' gender and sexual orientation matter?

机构信息

Institute for Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):465-472. doi: 10.1037/abn0000437.

Abstract

It has recently been proposed that compulsive sexual behavior disorder should be included in the 11th version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Concerns have been repeatedly expressed regarding the overpathologizing of sexual behaviors and the potential for false-positive results in clinical practice. Empirical evidence indicates that stereotypes related to gender and sexual orientation might influence therapists' assessments of clients. Those stereotypes are likely to be associated with different levels of pathologization and stigmatization of high levels of sexual interest and behavior. The aim of this study was to explore the possible connections between clients' gender and sexual orientation and mental health professionals' (MHP) pathologization of compulsive sexual behavior. A sample of MHPs (N = 546) were presented with a case vignette describing a client with compulsive sexual behavior. The information on the client varied by gender (male or female), sexual orientation (homosexual or heterosexual), and clinical condition (ambiguous diagnostic criteria and fulfilled compulsive sexual behavior disorder diagnostic criteria). After reading the vignette, the MHPs rated the client's mental health status and gave an opinion about causation (psychological vs. biological etiology) and stigmatization indicators (blaming the affected individual for their problems, desire for social distance, perception of dangerousness). The MHPs showed significantly fewer tendencies to pathologize when the client was a homosexual woman or man independent of their clinical condition. Mediation analyses revealed that the biological etiological model partly mediated the effects of reduced pathologization in homosexual clients. These results indicate that clinical decisions relating to compulsive sexual behavior are influenced by nosologically irrelevant beliefs about the biological causation of sexual behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

最近有人提议,将强迫性性行为障碍纳入第 11 版《国际疾病与相关健康问题统计分类》。人们反复对性行为过度病理化以及在临床实践中可能出现假阳性结果表示担忧。实证证据表明,与性别和性取向相关的刻板印象可能会影响治疗师对客户的评估。这些刻板印象可能与对高性欲和性行为的不同程度的病理化和污名化有关。本研究旨在探讨客户的性别和性取向与心理健康专业人员(MHP)对强迫性性行为病理化之间可能存在的联系。研究小组向 546 名心理健康专业人员展示了一个案例描述,描述了一名患有强迫性性行为障碍的客户。客户的信息因性别(男性或女性)、性取向(同性恋或异性恋)和临床状况(诊断标准不明确和符合强迫性性行为障碍诊断标准)而异。在阅读案例后,心理健康专业人员对客户的心理健康状况进行了评估,并对因果关系(心理或生物病因)和污名化指标(将问题归咎于受影响的个人、渴望社会距离、感知危险性)发表了意见。无论客户的临床状况如何,当客户是同性恋男性或女性时,心理健康专业人员表现出明显较少的病理化倾向。中介分析表明,生物病因学模型部分中介了同性恋客户病理化减少的影响。这些结果表明,与强迫性性行为相关的临床决策受到与性行为生物病因无关的、与疾病分类无关的信念的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验