• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急救医疗技术人员进行除颤的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of defibrillation by emergency medical technicians.

作者信息

Ornato J P, Craren E J, Gonzalez E R, Garnett A R, McClung B K, Newman M M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 1988 Mar;6(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90045-9.

DOI:10.1016/0735-6757(88)90045-9
PMID:3128305
Abstract

Effective emergency systems using emergency medical technicians (EMTs) trained to defibrillate or paramedics can save more lives from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation than can emergency systems staffed with basic EMTs who cannot defibrillate. This article focuses on the cost-effectiveness of systems staffed with each type of EMT. Data were collected from all 50 states and from the District of Columbia to determine the number of hours and estimated cost of initial training for the three types of EMTs in the United States in 1986. The median initial training hours for basic EMTs, EMTs trained in defibrillation, and paramedics were 110, 129, and 700, respectively. Median costs for initial training at each EMT level were +123, +150, and +1580/student. According to published survival data for emergency medical systems staffed with EMTs at each level, the total initial training personnel and equipment cost per life saved from ventricular fibrillation was +7687, +2126, and +2289 for systems staffed by the respective EMTs. The initial cost per life saved from ventricular fibrillation is more than three times greater in systems staffed by basic EMTs than in systems staffed by EMTs trained in defibrillation or paramedics. From a medical and a cost-effective standpoint, all communities served by basic EMTs should consider upgrading them to at least the defibrillation-trained EMT level.

摘要

使用经过除颤培训的急救医疗技术员(EMT)或护理人员的高效急救系统,相较于配备无除颤能力的基础EMT的急救系统,能挽救更多因心室颤动导致的院外心脏骤停患者的生命。本文聚焦于配备各类EMT的系统的成本效益。数据收集自美国所有50个州及哥伦比亚特区,以确定1986年美国三种类型EMT的初始培训时长及估计成本。基础EMT、接受除颤培训的EMT和护理人员的初始培训时长中位数分别为110小时、129小时和700小时。每个EMT级别初始培训的成本中位数分别为每位学生123美元、150美元和1580美元。根据已公布的各级别配备EMT的急救医疗系统的生存数据,因心室颤动每挽救一条生命,由相应EMT配备的系统的初始培训人员和设备总成本分别为7687美元、2126美元和2289美元。基础EMT配备的系统中,因心室颤动每挽救一条生命的初始成本,比接受除颤培训的EMT或护理人员配备的系统高出三倍多。从医学和成本效益的角度来看,所有由基础EMT服务的社区都应考虑将其升级到至少接受除颤培训的EMT级别。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of defibrillation by emergency medical technicians.急救医疗技术人员进行除颤的成本效益
Am J Emerg Med. 1988 Mar;6(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90045-9.
2
Treatment of ventricular fibrillation. Emergency medical technician defibrillation and paramedic services.心室颤动的治疗。紧急医疗技术人员除颤和护理人员服务。
JAMA. 1984 Apr 6;251(13):1723-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.13.1723.
3
Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study.由急诊医生还是急诊医疗技术人员进行早期除颤?一项对照、前瞻性多中心研究。
Resuscitation. 1994 May;27(3):197-206. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90033-7.
4
[Initial defibrillation by emergency physicians or by first aid assistants? A prospective, comparative multicenter study in outpatients with ventricular fibrillation].[由急诊医生还是急救助手进行首次除颤?一项针对心室颤动门诊患者的前瞻性、多中心比较研究]
Anaesthesist. 1994 Jan;43(1):36-49. doi: 10.1007/s001010050032.
5
An evaluation of automated defibrillation and manual defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.
Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90104-j.
6
Limitation on effectiveness of rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.农村地区紧急医疗技术人员进行快速除颤的有效性限制。
Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Dec;13(12):1096-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80331-5.
7
Defibrillation performed by the emergency medical technician.由急救医疗技术人员进行除颤。
Circulation. 1986 Dec;74(6 Pt 2):IV9-12.
8
Effect of first-responder automated defibrillation on time to therapeutic interventions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The Multicenter High Dose Epinephrine Study Group.急救人员自动除颤对院外心脏骤停期间至治疗性干预时间的影响。多中心大剂量肾上腺素研究组。
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Aug;22(8):1247-53. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80101-5.
9
Early defibrillation by EMTs: the Brussels experience.急救医疗技术人员的早期除颤:布鲁塞尔的经验。
Resuscitation. 1994 Mar;27(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90005-1.
10
Defibrillation in the field: should EMTs interpret rhythms?现场除颤:急救医疗技术员应解读心律吗?
Am J Emerg Med. 1986 May;4(3):274-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(86)90085-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of treating out of hospital cardiac arrest and the implications for resource-limited health systems.院外心脏骤停治疗成本效益的系统评价及其对资源有限卫生系统的影响。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 9;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00727-w.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Implications for Resource-limited Health Systems.院外心脏骤停治疗成本效益的系统评价:对资源有限的卫生系统的启示
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 4:rs.3.rs-4402626. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4402626/v1.