• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村地区紧急医疗技术人员进行快速除颤的有效性限制。

Limitation on effectiveness of rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.

作者信息

Ornato J P, McNeill S E, Craren E J, Nelson N M

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Dec;13(12):1096-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80331-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80331-5
PMID:6507970
Abstract

First-responding emergency medical technicians (EMTs) trained to defibrillate have been shown to increase survival from prehospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) almost fourfold in Washington's King County. Using Nebraska ambulance rescue run data from 1982 and published information relating ambulance response time to the likelihood that a patient would be in VF, we constructed a model to analyze the difference in expected results for EMT defibrillation among communities of varying population. The model predicts that EMTs in urban Nebraska (mean population 242,000) will use the defibrillator once every six weeks. EMTs in intermediate cities (mean population 22,300) will defibrillate once a year. In rural Nebraska (mean population 1,500), the defibrillator will be used once every 5.6 years. Despite these figures, the model predicts relatively low cost per life saved (ranging from $566 in urban areas to $4,785 in rural Nebraska). The major problem with EMT defibrillation in rural areas is maintenance of skills and continuing education.

摘要

在华盛顿州金县,接受过除颤培训的急救医疗技术员(EMT)已被证明能将院外心室颤动(VF)患者的存活率提高近四倍。利用内布拉斯加州1982年救护车救援运行数据以及已发表的有关救护车响应时间与患者发生VF可能性的信息,我们构建了一个模型,以分析不同人口规模社区中EMT除颤预期结果的差异。该模型预测,内布拉斯加州城市地区(平均人口24.2万)的EMT每六周使用一次除颤器。中等城市(平均人口2.23万)的EMT每年除颤一次。在内布拉斯加州农村地区(平均人口1500),除颤器每5.6年使用一次。尽管有这些数据,但该模型预测每挽救一条生命的成本相对较低(从城市地区的566美元到内布拉斯加州农村地区的4785美元不等)。农村地区EMT除颤的主要问题是技能维护和继续教育。

相似文献

1
Limitation on effectiveness of rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.农村地区紧急医疗技术人员进行快速除颤的有效性限制。
Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Dec;13(12):1096-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80331-5.
2
Cost-effectiveness of defibrillation by emergency medical technicians.急救医疗技术人员进行除颤的成本效益
Am J Emerg Med. 1988 Mar;6(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90045-9.
3
Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study.由急诊医生还是急诊医疗技术人员进行早期除颤?一项对照、前瞻性多中心研究。
Resuscitation. 1994 May;27(3):197-206. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90033-7.
4
EMT-defibrillation: the Wisconsin experience.
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Aug;18(8):806-11. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80200-8.
5
An evaluation of automated defibrillation and manual defibrillation by emergency medical technicians in a rural setting.
Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90104-j.
6
Prehospital defibrillation performed by emergency medical technicians in rural communities.农村社区急救医疗技术人员进行的院前除颤。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 26;310(4):219-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198401263100403.
7
Treatment of ventricular fibrillation. Emergency medical technician defibrillation and paramedic services.心室颤动的治疗。紧急医疗技术人员除颤和护理人员服务。
JAMA. 1984 Apr 6;251(13):1723-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.13.1723.
8
EMT-defibrillation in rural America.
Physician Assist. 1986 Sep;10(9):111-2, 117, 120-1 passim.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural/urban first-responder defibrillation program.农村/城市急救除颤项目的成本效益分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Jan-Mar;4(1):43-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120090941632.
10
Automatic external defibrillation: evaluations of its role in the home and in emergency medical services.自动体外除颤:对其在家庭及紧急医疗服务中作用的评估
Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Sep;13(9 Pt 2):798-801. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80441-2.

引用本文的文献

1
New dimensions in pre-hospital cardiac care for your community.为您的社区带来院前心脏护理的新维度。
Can Fam Physician. 1987 Apr;33:979-81.
2
Cost-effectiveness of in-home automated external defibrillators for individuals at increased risk of sudden cardiac death.家庭用自动体外除颤器对心脏性猝死风险增加个体的成本效益分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40247.x.
3
Access to Timely and Optimal Care of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes - Community Planning Considerations: A Report by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者获得及时和最佳治疗——社区规划考量:国家心脏病发作警报计划报告
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998 Jul;6(1):19-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1008820104852.