Bethea Audis, Samanta Damayanti, White Teresa, Payne Nancy, Hardway Jessica
Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research (Dr Bethea and Ms Samanta), Charleston Area Medical Center (Mss White, Payne, and Hardway), Charleston, West Virginia.
J Trauma Nurs. 2019 Jul/Aug;26(4):174-179. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000445.
Preexisting conditions and decreased physiological reserve in the elderly frequently complicate the provision of health care in this population. A Level 1 trauma center expanded its nurse practitioner (NP) model to facilitate admission of low-acuity patients, including the elderly, to trauma services. This model enabled NPs to initiate admissions and coordinate day-to-day care for low-acuity patients under the supervision of a trauma attending. The complexity of elderly trauma care and the need to evaluate the efficacy of management provided by NPs led to the development of the current study. Accordingly, this study endeavored to compare outcomes in elderly patients whose care was coordinated by trauma NP (TNP) versus nontrauma NP (NTNP) services. Patients under the care of TNPs had a 1.22-day shorter duration of hospitalization compared with that of the NTNP cohort (4.38 ± 3.54 vs. 5.60 ± 3.98, p = .048). Decreased length of stay in the TNP cohort resulted in an average decrease in hospital charges of $13,000 per admission ($38,053 ± $29,640.76 vs. $51,317.79 ± $34,756.83, p = .016). A significantly higher percentage of patients admitted to the TNP service were discharged home (67.1% vs. 36.0%, p = .002), and a significantly lower percentage of patients were discharged to skilled nursing facilities (25.7% vs. 51.9%, p = .040). These clinical and economic outcomes have proven beneficial in substantiating the care provided by TNPs at the study institution. Future research will focus on examining the association of positive outcomes with specific care elements routinely performed by the TNPs in the current practice model.
老年人先前存在的疾病和生理储备功能下降常常使该人群的医疗保健变得复杂。一家一级创伤中心扩展了其执业护士(NP)模式,以促进包括老年人在内的低 acuity 患者进入创伤服务。这种模式使 NPs 能够在创伤主治医生的监督下启动低 acuity 患者的入院程序并协调日常护理。老年创伤护理的复杂性以及评估 NPs 提供的管理效果的必要性导致了本研究的开展。因此,本研究旨在比较由创伤 NP(TNP)与非创伤 NP(NTNP)服务协调护理的老年患者的结局。与 NTNP 队列相比,TNP 护理的患者住院时间缩短了 1.22 天(4.38±3.54 天 vs. 5.60±3.98 天,p = 0.048)。TNP 队列住院时间的缩短导致每次入院的医院费用平均减少 13,000 美元(38,053±29,640.76 美元 vs. 51,317.79±34,756.83 美元,p = 0.016)。入住 TNP 服务的患者出院回家的比例显著更高(67.1% vs. 36.0%,p = 0.002),而出院到熟练护理机构的患者比例显著更低(25.7% vs. 51.9%,p = 0.040)。这些临床和经济结局已证明有助于证实研究机构中 TNP 提供的护理。未来的研究将集中于检查当前实践模式中 TNP 常规执行的特定护理要素与积极结局之间的关联。