Faculty of Sport Studies, Masaryk University, 62 500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 6;16(13):2410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132410.
: The main aim of the study was to explore the association between objectively measured physical fitness and the level of pain intensity. : In this cross-sectional study, we included 1036 adolescents (m ± SD = 16.3 ± 1.1 years; m ± SD = 1.74 ± 0.1 m; m ± SD = 64.7 ± 12.4 kg; m ± SD = 21.3 ± 3.0 kg/m) from 11 secondary schools located in the city of Zagreb (Croatia). Physical fitness was determined by using waist circumference, sit-ups in 1 min, standing long jump and sit-and-reach tests. Overall physical fitness index was calculated by summing the -score values of each physical fitness test. The level of pain intensity was assessed with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, a one-dimensional measure of pain intensity. Associations were calculated with correlation analyses. : In boys, pain intensity was associated with sit-ups in 1 min ( -0.16, < 0.001), standing long jump ( -0.14, 0.003) and overall physical fitness index ( -0.13, 0.004), while no significant associations with waist circumference ( 0.04, 0.438) and sit-and-reach test ( -0.01, 0.822) were observed. In girls, pain intensity was associated with standing long jump ( -0.17, < 0.001) and overall physical fitness index ( -0.10, 0.018), while no significant associations with waist circumference ( 0.01, 0.735), sit-ups in 1 min ( -0.06, 0.126) and sit-and-reach test ( -0.05, 0.232) were observed. When we adjusted for self-rated health, sleep duration, smoking status, alcohol consumption, screen-time and psychological distress, similar associations remained. : Our study shows a weak association between physical fitness and pain intensity in a large sample of adolescents. Although a cross-sectional design, health-professionals should use physical fitness as a screening tool to assess the level of pain intensity.
: 本研究的主要目的是探讨身体机能的客观测量值与疼痛强度水平之间的关联。: 在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了来自萨格勒布市(克罗地亚) 11 所中学的 1036 名青少年(m ± SD = 16.3 ± 1.1 岁;m ± SD = 1.74 ± 0.1 m;m ± SD = 64.7 ± 12.4 kg;m ± SD = 21.3 ± 3.0 kg/m)。身体机能通过仰卧起坐 1 分钟测试、立位体前屈测试、立定跳远测试和坐站起测试进行测量。整体身体机能指数通过对每个身体机能测试的 -分数值求和计算得出。疼痛强度水平通过数字疼痛评分量表进行评估,这是一种一维的疼痛强度衡量工具。相关性分析用于计算关联。: 在男孩中,疼痛强度与仰卧起坐 1 分钟测试( -0.16, < 0.001)、立定跳远测试( -0.14, 0.003)和整体身体机能指数( -0.13, 0.004)呈负相关,而与腰围( 0.04, 0.438)和坐站起测试( -0.01, 0.822)无显著关联。在女孩中,疼痛强度与立定跳远测试( -0.17, < 0.001)和整体身体机能指数( -0.10, 0.018)呈负相关,而与腰围( 0.01, 0.735)、仰卧起坐 1 分钟测试( -0.06, 0.126)和坐站起测试( -0.05, 0.232)无显著关联。当我们对自我报告的健康状况、睡眠时间、吸烟状况、饮酒状况、屏幕时间和心理困扰进行调整后,仍然存在类似的关联。: 我们的研究表明,在一个较大的青少年样本中,身体机能与疼痛强度之间存在微弱关联。尽管是横断面设计,但健康专业人员应该将身体机能作为一种筛查工具,以评估疼痛强度水平。