Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Sport Motorics and Methodology in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10702-2.
Although evidence suggests that functional endurance capacity is the most important component associated with future health, little is known of how it is associated with multiple other physical fitness components. Since various physical fitness aspects do not change the same as functional endurance capacity during childhood, it is necessary to establish possible associations between functional endurance capacity and other physical fitness components in children. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to test the associations between functional endurance capacity with other physical fitness components in 7-14-year-old children, stratified by gender.
In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 1612 children [mean age ± standard deviation (SD) = 9.72 ± 2.37 years; 52.5% girls). Health-related physical fitness components included: 1) body-mass index (kg/m) calculated from height and weight (measure of body size), 2) sit-and-reach test (measure of flexibility), 3) standing broad jump (measure of explosive strength of lower extremities), 4) sit-ups in 30 s (measure of repetitive strength of the trunk), 5) 10 × 5 shuttle run test (measure of agility) and 6) 20-m shuttle run test (measure of functional endurance capacity). The associations were performed using generalized estimating equations with beta (β) coefficients.
After adjusting for age, functional endurance capacity was associated with sit-and-reach test (β = 0.13, p < 0.001), standing broad jump (β = 0.59, p < 0.001), sit-ups in 30 s (β = 0.53, p < 0.001) and 10 × 5 shuttle run test (β = - 0.56, p < 0.001) in boys. In girls, functional endurance capacity was associated with body-mass index (β = - 0.12, p < 0.001), sit-and-reach test (β = 0.21, p < 0.001), standing broad jump (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), sit-ups in 30 s (β = 0.36, p < 0.001) and 10 × 5 shuttle run test (β = - 0.40, p < 0.001). No significant associations between functional endurance capacity and body-mass index in boys were observed.
Although significant, functional endurance capacity is weakly to moderately associated with other physical fitness components, pointing out that such measure should be tested separately from other aspects of physical fitness in school-aged children.
尽管有证据表明,功能耐力能力是与未来健康最相关的最重要组成部分,但对于它与其他多个身体健康成分的关联知之甚少。由于在儿童时期,各种身体健康方面的变化与功能耐力能力的变化不同,因此有必要确定功能耐力能力与儿童其他身体健康成分之间的可能关联。因此,该研究的主要目的是按性别分层,测试 7-14 岁儿童的功能耐力能力与其他身体健康成分之间的关联。
在这项横断面研究中,我们招募了 1612 名儿童[平均年龄±标准差(SD)=9.72±2.37 岁;52.5%为女孩]。健康相关的身体素质成分包括:1)身体质量指数(kg/m),由身高和体重计算得出(衡量身体大小),2)坐式伸展测试(衡量柔韧性),3)站立跳远(衡量下肢爆发力),4)30 秒仰卧起坐(衡量躯干的重复力量),5)10×5 穿梭跑测试(衡量敏捷性)和 6)20 米穿梭跑测试(衡量功能耐力能力)。使用广义估计方程和β(β)系数进行关联分析。
在调整年龄后,男孩的功能耐力能力与坐式伸展测试(β=0.13,p<0.001)、站立跳远(β=0.59,p<0.001)、30 秒仰卧起坐(β=0.53,p<0.001)和 10×5 穿梭跑测试(β=-0.56,p<0.001)相关。在女孩中,功能耐力能力与身体质量指数(β=-0.12,p<0.001)、坐式伸展测试(β=0.21,p<0.001)、站立跳远(β=0.25,p<0.001)、30 秒仰卧起坐(β=0.36,p<0.001)和 10×5 穿梭跑测试(β=-0.40,p<0.001)相关。在男孩中,功能耐力能力与身体质量指数之间没有显著关联。
尽管功能耐力能力与其他身体素质成分有显著关联,但关联程度较弱到中等,这表明在学龄儿童中,应分别测试该指标与其他身体素质成分的关系。