Suppr超能文献

初级保健医生同理心与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件和全因死亡率风险之间的关联:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。

Association Between Primary Care Practitioner Empathy and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):311-318. doi: 10.1370/afm.2421.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the association between primary care practitioner (physician and nurse) empathy and incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a population-based prospective cohort study of 49 general practices in East Anglia (United Kingdom). The study population included 867 individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes who were followed up for an average of 10 years until December 31, 2014 in the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People With Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION)-Cambridge trial. Twelve months after diagnosis, patients assessed practitioner empathy and their experiences of diabetes care during the preceding year using the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure questionnaire. CARE scores were grouped into tertiles. The main outcome measures were first recorded CVD event (a composite of myocardial infarction, revascularization, nontraumatic amputation, stroke, and fatal CVD event) and all-cause mortality, obtained from electronic searches of the general practitioner record, national registries, and hospital records. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models adjusted for relevant confounders. The ADDITION-Cambridge trial is registered as ISRCTN86769081.

RESULTS

Of the 628 participants with a completed CARE score, 120 (19%) experienced a CVD event, and 132 (21%) died during follow up. In the multivariable model, compared with the lowest tertile, higher empathy scores were associated with a lower risk of CVD events (although this did not achieve statistical significance) and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HRs for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.88, = .01 and 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35-1.04, = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive patient experiences of practitioner empathy in the year after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes may be associated with beneficial long-term clinical outcomes. Further work is needed to understand which aspects of patient perceptions of empathy might influence health outcomes and how to incorporate this understanding into the education and training of practitioners.

摘要

目的

探讨初级保健医生(医生和护士)同理心与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病(CVD)事件和全因死亡率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,涉及东安格利亚的 49 家全科诊所(英国)。研究人群包括 867 名经筛查发现的 2 型糖尿病患者,他们在 Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People With Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care(ADDITION)-Cambridge 试验中平均随访 10 年,直至 2014 年 12 月 31 日。在诊断后 12 个月,患者使用咨询和关系同理心(CARE)量表问卷评估医生同理心以及他们在前一年的糖尿病护理体验。CARE 评分分为三分位组。主要结局指标是首次记录 CVD 事件(心肌梗死、血运重建、非创伤性截肢、中风和致命 CVD 事件的复合事件)和全因死亡率,通过全科医生记录、国家登记处和医院记录的电子搜索获得。使用 Cox 模型调整相关混杂因素后,估计危险比(HRs)。ADDITION-Cambridge 试验注册为 ISRCTN86769081。

结果

在完成 CARE 评分的 628 名参与者中,有 120 名(19%)发生 CVD 事件,132 名(21%)在随访期间死亡。在多变量模型中,与最低三分位组相比,同理心评分较高与 CVD 事件风险较低(尽管这没有达到统计学意义)和全因死亡率较低相关(中三分位组和最高三分位组的 HR 分别为:0.49;95%CI,0.27-0.88, =.01 和 0.60;95%CI,0.35-1.04, =.05)。

结论

2 型糖尿病诊断后患者对医生同理心的积极体验可能与长期临床结局有益相关。需要进一步研究了解患者对同理心的哪些方面可能影响健康结果,以及如何将这种理解纳入医生的教育和培训。

相似文献

5
Modification of cardiovascular disease risk by health behaviour change following type 2 diabetes diagnosis.
Diabet Med. 2021 Oct;38(10):e14646. doi: 10.1111/dme.14646. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Moderate weight change following diabetes diagnosis and 10 year incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality.
Diabetologia. 2019 Aug;62(8):1391-1402. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4886-1. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure to Turkish.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(6):721. doi: 10.3390/bs15060721.
4
Updating the Definition for Humanism in Healthcare: Kind, Safe, and Trustworthy.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jun 6;12:23743735251340506. doi: 10.1177/23743735251340506. eCollection 2025.
5
6
Strengthening general practice will help improve longevity and could reduce health inequalities.
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):86-89. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X740757. Print 2025 Feb.
7
8
Patients' experiences of GP consultations following the introduction of the new GP contract in Scotland: a cross-sectional survey.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan 25;74(739):e63-e70. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0239. Print 2024 Feb.
9
The biopsychosociotechnical model: a systems-based framework for human-centered health improvement.
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Jan 30;12(4):387-407. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2029584. eCollection 2023.
10
Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative evaluation of the views of patients.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Sep 26;74(747):e702-e708. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0437. Print 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

2
4
Optimism and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):21-29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww182. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Tackling the crisis in general practice.
BMJ. 2016 Feb 17;352:i942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i942.
9
Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):227-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352.
10
The NHS Five Year Forward View: implications for clinicians.
BMJ. 2014 Oct 31;349:g6518. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6518.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验