Motegi Masaomi, Yamamoto Yutaka, Tada Takeshi, Takahashi Masahiro, Sampei Sayaka, Sano Hiromi, Morino Tsunetaro, Komori Manabu, Miura Masahiro, Yamamoto Kazuhisa, Yaguchi Yuichiro, Sakurai Yuika, Kojima Hiromi
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Aug;15(2):184-188. doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.6349.
To assess the clinical characteristics of extent patterns in pars tensa cholesteatoma.
This was a retrospective chart review. Forty-four patients with pars tensa cholesteatoma who underwent primary surgery at a tertiary academic medical center were included. The main outcomes measured were sex, age, clinical background, and stage classification of pars tensa cholesteatoma (including the extent of cholesteatoma and involvement of the sinus tympani) according to two staging classifications: criteria advocated by the Japanese Otological Society (JOS) and those advocated by the European Academy of Otology and Neuro-Otology (EAONO)/JOS joint consensus statements.
The mean patient age ± standard deviation was 38.4±19.6 years. The patients comprised 19 men and 25 women. According to the JOS classification, 18 ears (40.9%) were classified as stage I, 22 (50.0%) as stage II, and 4 (9.1%) as stage III. According to the EAONO/JOS joint consensus statements, 14 ears (31.8%) were classified as stage I, 26 (59.1%) as stage II, and 4 (9.1%) as stage III. Fourteen ears (31.8%) demonstrated involvement of the sinus tympani. Four ears (9.1%) that were originally categorized as stage I cholesteatoma by the JOS criteria showed sinus tympani invasion and were subsequently categorized as stage II according to the EAONO/JOS criteria.
We determined the clinical characteristics of pars tensa cholesteatoma based on the novel and well-defined classification criteria. Further studies including long-term outcomes are necessary to demonstrate the clinical relevance of the discrepancy between the two criteria with respect to involvement of the sinus tympani.
评估紧张部胆脂瘤范围模式的临床特征。
这是一项回顾性病历审查。纳入了在一家三级学术医疗中心接受初次手术的44例紧张部胆脂瘤患者。根据两种分期分类法测量的主要结果包括性别、年龄、临床背景以及紧张部胆脂瘤的分期分类(包括胆脂瘤范围和鼓室窦受累情况):日本耳科学会(JOS)倡导的标准以及欧洲耳科学与神经耳科学学会(EAONO)/JOS联合共识声明倡导的标准。
患者的平均年龄±标准差为38.4±19.6岁。患者包括19名男性和25名女性。根据JOS分类,18耳(40.9%)被分类为I期,22耳(50.0%)为II期,4耳(9.1%)为III期。根据EAONO/JOS联合共识声明,14耳(31.8%)被分类为I期,26耳(59.1%)为II期,4耳(9.1%)为III期。14耳(31.8%)显示鼓室窦受累。4耳(9.1%)最初根据JOS标准被分类为I期胆脂瘤,显示有鼓室窦侵犯,随后根据EAONO/JOS标准被重新分类为II期。
我们基于新颖且明确的分类标准确定了紧张部胆脂瘤的临床特征。有必要进行包括长期结果在内的进一步研究,以证明两种标准在鼓室窦受累方面差异的临床相关性。