Rao Krishna D, Srivastava Swati, Warren Nicole, Mayra Kaveri, Gore Aboli, Das Aritra, Ahmed Saifuddin
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Division Health Economics Health Financing, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e027147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027147.
Clinician scarcity in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) often results in de facto task shifting; this raises concerns about the quality of care. This study examines if a long-term mentoring programme improved the ability of auxiliary nurse-midwives (ANMs), who function as paramedical community health workers, to provide quality care during childbirth, and how they compared with staff nurses.
Quasi-experimental post-test with matched comparison group.
Primary health centres (PHC) in the state of Bihar, India; a total of 239 PHCs surveyed and matched analysis based on 190 (134 intervention and 56 comparison) facilities.
Analysis based on 335 ANMs (237 mentored and 98 comparison) and 42 staff nurses (28 mentored and 14 comparison).
Mentoring for a duration of 6-9 months focused on nurses at PHCs to improve the quality of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care.
Nurse ability to provide correct actions in managing cases of normal delivery, postpartum haemorrhage and neonatal resuscitation assessed using a combination of clinical vignettes and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.
Mentoring increased correct actions taken by ANMs to manage normal deliveries by 17.5 (95% CI 14.8 to 20.2), postpartum haemorrhage by 25.9 (95% CI 22.4 to 29.4) and neonatal resuscitation 28.4 (95% CI 23.2 to 33.7) percentage points. There was no significant difference between the average ability of mentored ANMs and staff nurses. However, they provided only half the required correct actions. There was substantial variation in ability; 41% of nurses for normal delivery, 60% for postpartum haemorrhage and 45% for neonatal resuscitation provided less than half the correct actions. Ability declined with time after mentoring was completed.
Mentoring improved the ability of ANMs to levels comparable with trained nurses. However, only some mentored nurses have the ability to conduct quality deliveries. Continuing education programmes are critical to sustain quality gains.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)临床医生短缺常常导致实际的任务转移;这引发了对医疗质量的担忧。本研究调查了一项长期指导计划是否提高了作为辅助医疗社区卫生工作者的辅助护士 - 助产士(ANM)在分娩期间提供高质量护理的能力,以及他们与注册护士相比情况如何。
带有匹配对照组的准实验性后测。
印度比哈尔邦的初级卫生中心(PHC);共调查了239个初级卫生中心,并基于190个(134个干预组和56个对照组)设施进行匹配分析。
基于335名辅助护士 - 助产士(237名接受指导和98名对照)和42名注册护士(28名接受指导和14名对照)进行分析。
为期6 - 9个月的指导,重点针对初级卫生中心的护士,以提高基本产科急诊和新生儿护理的质量。
使用临床病例 vignettes 和客观结构化临床考试相结合的方式评估护士在处理正常分娩、产后出血和新生儿复苏病例时采取正确行动的能力。
指导使辅助护士 - 助产士在处理正常分娩时采取正确行动的比例提高了17.5个百分点(95%置信区间14.8至20.2),产后出血时提高了25.9个百分点(95%置信区间22.4至29.4),新生儿复苏时提高了28.4个百分点(95%置信区间23.2至33.7)。接受指导的辅助护士 - 助产士和注册护士的平均能力没有显著差异。然而,他们仅提供了所需正确行动的一半。能力存在很大差异;41%的护士在正常分娩、60%的护士在产后出血以及45%的护士在新生儿复苏时提供的正确行动不到一半。指导结束后能力随时间下降。
指导提高了辅助护士 - 助产士的能力,使其达到与受过培训的护士相当的水平。然而,只有一些接受指导的护士有能力进行高质量的分娩。继续教育计划对于维持质量提升至关重要。