Suppr超能文献

Veterans 对 Veterans Choice Program 早期医疗保健体验的满意度:一项同期混合方法研究。

Veteran Satisfaction with Early Experiences of Health Care Through the Veterans Choice Program: a Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS), Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1925-1933. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05116-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act (i.e., "Choice") allows eligible Veterans to receive covered health care outside the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. The initial implementation of Choice was challenging, and use was limited in the first year.

OBJECTIVE

To assess satisfaction with Choice, and identify reasons for satisfaction and dissatisfaction during its early implementation.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Semi-structured telephone interviews from July to September 2015 with Choice-eligible Veterans from 25 VA facilities across the USA.

MAIN MEASURES

Satisfaction was assessed with 5-point Likert scales and open-ended questions. We compared ratings of satisfaction with Choice and VA health care, and identified reasons for satisfaction/dissatisfaction with Choice in a thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative data.

RESULTS

Of 195 participants, 35 had not attempted to use Choice; 43 attempted but had not received Choice care (i.e., attempted only); and 117 attempted and received Choice care. Among those who attempted only, a smaller percentage were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice than with VA health care (17.9% and 71.8%, p < 0.001); among participants who received Choice, similar percentages were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice and VA health care (66.6% and 71.1%, p = 0.45). When asked what contributed to Choice ratings, participants who attempted but did not receive Choice care reported poor access (50%), scheduling problems (20%), and care coordination issues (10%); participants who received Choice care reported improved access (27%), good quality of care (19%), and good distance to Choice provider (16%). Regardless of receipt of Choice care, most participants expressed interest in using Choice in the future (70-82%).

CONCLUSIONS

Access and scheduling barriers contributed to dissatisfaction for Veterans unsuccessfully attempting to use Choice during its initial implementation, whereas improved access and good care contributed to satisfaction for those receiving Choice care. With Veterans' continued interest in using services outside VA facilities, subsequent policy changes should address Veterans' barriers to care.

摘要

背景

2014 年退伍军人医疗保健选择和责任法案(即“选择”)允许符合条件的退伍军人在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统之外获得医疗保险。“选择”最初的实施具有挑战性,并且在第一年的使用受到限制。

目的

评估对“选择”的满意度,并确定在早期实施过程中满意和不满意的原因。

设计和参与者

2015 年 7 月至 9 月,从美国 25 个 VA 设施中选择符合条件的退伍军人进行半结构化电话访谈。

主要措施

使用 5 分李克特量表和开放式问题评估满意度。我们比较了对“选择”和 VA 医疗保健的满意度评分,并对开放式定性数据进行主题分析,确定了对“选择”满意/不满意的原因。

结果

在 195 名参与者中,35 人未尝试使用“选择”;43 人尝试但未获得“选择”护理(即仅尝试);117 人尝试并获得“选择”护理。在仅尝试的人群中,对“选择”的满意度低于对 VA 医疗保健的满意度(17.9%和 71.8%,p<0.001);在接受“选择”的参与者中,对“选择”和 VA 医疗保健的满意度相似(66.6%和 71.1%,p=0.45)。当被问及是什么导致了对“选择”的评价时,未获得“选择”护理的参与者报告称,较差的可及性(50%)、预约问题(20%)和护理协调问题(10%)是主要原因;而获得“选择”护理的参与者则报告说,可及性提高(27%)、护理质量良好(19%)以及距离“选择”提供者较近(16%)是主要原因。无论是否接受过“选择”护理,大多数参与者都表示有兴趣在未来使用“选择”(70-82%)。

结论

在“选择”最初实施期间,未能成功尝试使用“选择”的退伍军人,由于可及性和预约障碍而导致不满,而获得“选择”护理的退伍军人则因可及性提高和良好的护理而感到满意。鉴于退伍军人继续有兴趣在 VA 设施外使用服务,随后的政策变化应解决退伍军人护理方面的障碍。

相似文献

2
Experiences with the Veterans' Choice Program. Veterans' Choice 计划的相关经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2141-2149. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05224-y. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

6
Preventive Care Delivery After the Veterans Choice Program.《退伍军人选择计划后的预防保健服务提供》
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.029. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Developing network adequacy standards for VA Community Care.制定 VA 社区护理网络充足标准。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):400-408. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13651. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验