Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements (AASPE), UMR 7209, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle-CNRS, Paris, France.
Function, Evolution & Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019 Sep;170(1):37-47. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23899. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
The basicranium and face are two integrated bony structures displaying great morphological diversity across primates. Previous studies in hominids determined that the basicranium is composed of two independent modules: the midline basicranium, mostly influenced by brain size, and the lateral basicranium, predominantly associated with facial shape. To better assess how morphological integration impacts the evolution of primate cranial shape diversity, we test to determine whether the relationships found in hominids are retained across the order.
Three-dimensional landmarks (29) were placed on 143 computed tomography scans of six major clades of extant primate crania. We assessed the covariation between midline basicranium, lateral basicranium, face, and endocranial volume using phylogenetically informed partial least squares analyses and phylogenetic generalized least squares models.
We found significant integration between lateral basicranium and face and between midline basicranium and face. We also described a significant correlation between midline basicranium and endocranial volume but not between lateral basicranium and endocranial volume.
Our findings demonstrate a significant and pervasive integration in the craniofacial structures across primates, differing from previous results in hominids. The uniqueness of module organization in hominids may explain this distinction. We found that endocranial volume is significantly integrated to the midline basicranium but not to the lateral basicranium. This finding underlines the significant effect of brain size on the shape of the midline structures of the cranial base in primates. With the covariations linking the studied features defined here, we suggest that future studies should focus on determining the causal links between them.
颅底和面部是两个完整的骨骼结构,在灵长类动物中表现出极大的形态多样性。先前在人类中的研究确定颅底由两个独立的模块组成:主要受大脑大小影响的中线颅底,和主要与面部形状相关的外侧颅底。为了更好地评估形态整合如何影响灵长类动物颅形多样性的进化,我们测试了在整个灵长目动物中是否保留了在人类中发现的关系。
在 143 个现生灵长类动物颅骨的计算机断层扫描图像上放置了 29 个三维标志点。我们使用基于系统发育的偏最小二乘分析和系统发育广义最小二乘模型,评估了中线颅底、外侧颅底、面部和内颅容量之间的协变关系。
我们发现外侧颅底和面部之间以及中线颅底和面部之间存在显著的整合。我们还描述了中线颅底和内颅容量之间存在显著的相关性,但外侧颅底和内颅容量之间没有相关性。
我们的发现表明,在灵长类动物中,颅面结构存在显著而普遍的整合,与人类中的先前结果不同。人类中模块组织的独特性可能解释了这种区别。我们发现内颅容量与中线颅底显著相关,但与外侧颅底无关。这一发现强调了大脑大小对灵长类动物颅底中线结构形状的显著影响。有了这里定义的研究特征之间的协变,我们建议未来的研究应该集中于确定它们之间的因果关系。